Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/14/2011 7:15:58 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Second Amendment First

Thank God. Now do the right thing.


2 posted on 11/14/2011 7:18:44 AM PST by NowApproachingMidnight (“Civilizations die from suicide, not murder.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

3 posted on 11/14/2011 7:18:58 AM PST by TSgt (whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to abolish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Supreme Court will hear legal fight over health care overhaul; arguments likely in late March

http://www.nwcn.com/news/national/133804248.html


4 posted on 11/14/2011 7:19:55 AM PST by Second Amendment First ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First



OBAMACARE ON THE DOCKET

5 posted on 11/14/2011 7:20:11 AM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

IT IS ABOUT TIME!!!!!!


6 posted on 11/14/2011 7:20:49 AM PST by Dem Guard (Obama's 57 States = The Organization of The Islamic Conference (OIC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Should be a slam dunk NO.. it's unconstitutional.
7 posted on 11/14/2011 7:20:53 AM PST by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

I hope this doesn’t mean they were waiting on that decision from the DC Circuit. I think the solution will lie not within the Supreme Court but rather in the 2012 election and subsequent repeal. And it is time to reign in the Commerce Clause with a limiting amendment.


13 posted on 11/14/2011 7:34:23 AM PST by NonValueAdded (At 4 AM, it is a test; at 2 PM, it is a demonstration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

According to Judge Napolitano on Fox Business just now, the SCOTUS DID NOT AGREE TO HEAR THE OBAMACARE CASE! But rather it has agreed to hear whether or not those bringing the case “HAVE THE STANDING TO DO SO!”
Personally, I think we need to impeach all of these a$$holes! The country is burning and they continue to fiddle! They are a total disgrace to this nation, every last one of them. They all need to be replaced.


14 posted on 11/14/2011 7:35:01 AM PST by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Mark Levin had comments on the DC appeals court decision last week and how the Reagan-appointed judge agreed with the Rat-appointed judge that the law is constitutional. He said his Landmark Legal Foundation would be filing a brief detailing where the judge got it wrong.

Here is Mark's link to an explanation from the Washington Examiner:
D.C. federal appeals court upholds Obamacare; no impact on SCOTUS case

15 posted on 11/14/2011 7:37:47 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

They need to issue an injunction right now. Damage is being done - right now.


18 posted on 11/14/2011 7:49:59 AM PST by apastron (I miss the good old days - when bankers just jumped out of a window...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Fox News has the ugliest lesbian on TV right now can I sue for emotional distress?


19 posted on 11/14/2011 7:56:33 AM PST by Dengar01 (Dengar01 - "Heartless" since 1983!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Think about this for a moment. Dems have been screaming bloody murder for decades that health care is too inaccessible, yet in almost the same breath they whine and moan about how there are too many people straining Mother Gaia’s resources. Then, when they think no one’s watching, they whisper about how they wouldn’t mind a violent revolution to dispose of those of us who refuse to think like them.

They must be true idiots.

Now, when they start advocating for fatty, sugary foods, pay-for-service healthcare, gun rights, that is, anything and everything that raises the mortality ate of their “inferiors”, I’ll be at somewhat impressed (repulsed, but at least they’ll look intelligently diabolic).


30 posted on 11/14/2011 8:38:45 AM PST by Windcatcher (Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is his armband-wearing propaganda machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Based on the 11th Circuit Court decision I have no confidence the SC will rule it unconstitutional. Kennedy has all the cover he needs from Silberman to rule in favor of the law.


40 posted on 11/14/2011 9:39:22 AM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Unfortunately, I don’t have that much confidence the SC will do the right thing. The fact that we have to take this to the SC to determine if the government can make us buy something is beyond insane.


46 posted on 11/14/2011 9:58:53 AM PST by deep (http://www.americansagainstobama.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First; OldDeckHand; tired_old_conservative; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

48 posted on 11/14/2011 10:24:28 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
When you boil it down, this decision will determine whether or not we own our money or property.

If the government can mandate what you can buy, it surely can mandate what you can't buy.

One day the government may come to my house and tell me to buy a gun and a Bible. Next day the government may come to may house and tell me to buy a Chevy Volt, and a particular brand of condoms. And when you don't buy what the government tells you...

I won't go to the government's camps without bringing death and destruction with me.

5.56mm

50 posted on 11/14/2011 10:34:29 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

If government can force you to buy things, Freedom is a sham.

REVOLUTION!


56 posted on 11/14/2011 12:30:23 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Gore Lauds Romney on Climate Position; 0bamaCare was based on RomneyCare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

You know, I tend to get excited over news items like this, only to get hit with the perverbial sledgehammer of disappointment later. So I will hold me enthusiasm until I see that Kagan has recused herself or that Kennedy isn’t channeling his inner Ted Kennedy on this one.


58 posted on 11/14/2011 4:48:45 PM PST by rsflynn (Life is hard....twice as hard if you are stupid -- John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Someone called into Mark Levin and mentioned the Militia Act of 1792 as a case of gov't requiring Americans to buy things.

It's true, but the caller misses the constitution specifically mentions a "well regulated militia" in the 2nd amendment. The act also limits the requirement to own and maintain arms to registered militiamen who fit criteria of being able-bodied white men between 18 and 45. (Yes, it specifies white men.)

That's much different from requiring all Americans to buy healthcare.

59 posted on 11/14/2011 5:36:24 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Someone called into Mark Levin and mentioned the Militia Act of 1792 as a case of gov't requiring Americans to buy things.

It's true, but the caller misses the constitution specifically mentions a "well regulated militia" in the 2nd amendment. The act also limits the requirement to own and maintain arms to registered militiamen who fit criteria of being able-bodied white men between 18 and 45. (Yes, it specifies white men.)

That's much different from requiring all Americans to buy healthcare.

60 posted on 11/14/2011 5:36:24 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson