Wow!
Is it really that difficult to not have sex with kids?
I'm having a bit of trouble understanding why this is sexual abuse...
My first question is why is a seventh grader girl going "commando" to school wearing a skirt
My second question is if a school employee and an other student saw this event, and the principal was sexually abusing the girl, that's got to be the height of stupidity or arrogance
Seems to me a lot of pertinent facts from the story is missing...
I'm having a bit of trouble understanding why this is sexual abuse...
My first question is why is a seventh grader girl going "commando" to school wearing a skirt
My second question is if a school employee and an other student saw this event, and the principal was sexually abusing the girl, that's got to be the height of stupidity or arrogance
Seems to me a lot of pertinent facts from the story is missing...before we hang her from the highest tree
oh...................kay..............
So the STUDENT came to school with no underwear on, a la Britanny Spears, and the principal showed the student’s shiney hiney, and the two “horrified” teachers turned the PRINCIPAL in to Child Service?
The STUDENT should have been sent home and told not to return unless she had underwear on. And maybe shorts on too.
I’m hoping the $15,000+ mentioned in the article is a typo...should be more like $1.5 million.
Even if the principal’s actions were an innocent mistake(!), the teachers should not have been fired for THEIR actions.
This is especially true if you blow the whistle on a homosexual abuser. You wouldn't want to be branded an intolerant homophobe, would you??