Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
I don't understand why this is an issue.

If it's your property, whether separated from another element or not ... it is your property.

2 posted on 11/09/2011 5:53:51 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: knarf

I have leased farmland for the coal in my career. You would be surprised at the number of land owners who don’t know someone else owns the coal or other valuables underneath.


6 posted on 11/09/2011 5:59:57 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: knarf

It’s an issue because the gas companies want to alter state law to skirt your rights as an individual property owner to say no to drilling.

They want to bundle or “collectivize” these rights for streamlined negotiation purposes and to minimize the impact of holdout landowners.

I am all for Marcellus Fracking but we cannot do this sort of harm to individual property rights.


9 posted on 11/09/2011 6:39:38 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: knarf

Not generally. Mineral rights exist separate from the property ownership. They have separate deeds and separate transferal procedures—in most jurisdictions. It’s been that way for a very long time.


10 posted on 11/09/2011 6:44:52 AM PST by Sudetenland (There can be no freedom without God--What man gives, man can take away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson