Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Somehow in Paul's world, the In God We Trust motto violates State's Rights.
1 posted on 11/04/2011 7:44:01 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: mnehring

Well it DID originate with the Lincoln administration. During the Civil War. Didn’t actually become an official motto until 1956. Waste of time.


2 posted on 11/04/2011 7:46:22 PM PDT by Huck (TAX TEA NOW==SUPPORT 9-9-9!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Dr. Demento strikes again!

What a vile....Hadda stop myself before I get banned.


3 posted on 11/04/2011 7:48:45 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (Chairman Obama And Ron Paul Are Sure Signs The Republic Is In Serious Trouble. God Help Us All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
In whom doth Paul trust?

The Founding Fathers would, I think, regard him as an aberrant creature.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
— John Adams

4 posted on 11/04/2011 7:49:01 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

We have very stupid people in Congress, passing such a meaningless piece of tripe BS is a total waste of time and money. While I trust in God, I do not need the idiots in congress to waste money on something as empty as this bill.

While they steal us blid they pass BS like this.


5 posted on 11/04/2011 7:51:37 PM PDT by stockpirate (Why are homosexuals so hetrophobic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Obviously Paul wants every state to be able to set their own National motto.

He probably thinks we need 50 National Anthems and why not 50 National flags.


6 posted on 11/04/2011 7:53:13 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Ron Paul should just run for National President for the state of Texas. He might be able to win that one.


7 posted on 11/04/2011 7:55:36 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

And this be our motto: "In God is our trust."


Lyric From Star Spangled Banner

Donate

8 posted on 11/04/2011 7:56:15 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
Paul's with the rest of the Godless - hates anything religious, makes him and his acolytes uncomfortable.

I suggest they all move to France, and if that's too stifling, perhaps Russia.

11 posted on 11/04/2011 8:02:05 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Ron Paul and Jon Stewart. Is this what American has become? My apologies to those who died in the Revolutionary War.


12 posted on 11/04/2011 8:03:17 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Putin’s Russia Today has much love for Ron Paul... because Putin’s a champion for freedom and the 10th Amendment, don’t ya’ know.

The only conceivable reason for the Soviets and their Iranian friends to spend this much time and effort propping up Ron Paul is a third-party run that will deliver a second Obama term and finish us off. That so many people could be so impervious to something so obvious is a testament to how dumb this country has become.


13 posted on 11/04/2011 8:03:50 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Well I dont like Ron Paul then. Simple. Nice how an issue can clear the ranks so easily. Ron thinks state rights trumps God’s rights, then Ron goes PLONK.

Simple, thanks for the post.


14 posted on 11/04/2011 8:04:44 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Both Ron Paul and Obama are anti semitic as their past actions and politics and policies and words have shown all those who use their minds to think and discern what men really mean when they talk.


20 posted on 11/04/2011 8:13:36 PM PDT by kindred ( Third party conservatism is on the rise, God bless the conservative tea party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

And he would have gotten away with it too if it weren’t for those meddling Freepers!


21 posted on 11/04/2011 8:13:42 PM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Mittt Romney - he lacks the courage of his absence of convictions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
"I would have voted 'no' not because I don't like the motto and don't think we can use it but 'no' because we were telling the states what to do," Paul tells the news organization The Hill.

Ping for later

23 posted on 11/04/2011 8:18:49 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2703506/posts?page=518#518)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Ron Paul is crazier than an outhouse rat!


27 posted on 11/04/2011 8:28:44 PM PDT by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
Actually not. If you read the resolution you will see that apart from reciting much of the history of the motto, the resolution has two components. The first is to "re-affirm" that In God We Trust is our nation's motto. That has about as much meaning as "re-affirming" that George Washington was our first president. Everybody knows that In God We Trust is the nation's motto, at this point that is simply a fact. The first aspect of the resolution can't have any effect on the motto, and it is, except for the theatrics of it, a complete waste of time and effort.

The second component of the resolution is "supporting and encouraging the public display of the national motto in all public buildings, public schools, and other government institutions." While doing so certainly isn't a bad thing, state and local governments already do display that motto and other mottos and even things like the Ten Commandments if they can without the federal government suing them.

Is it really the federal government's job to tell local and state governments what they should display on their buildings? Do they even have the right to do so? Put another way, when the Democrats had control of the House and the Senate would it have been OK for them to pass a resolution "encouraging" the display of a picture of President Obama in every public school and government building with the phrase "Yes we Can" under it? I think not.

There really is no principled, constitutional reason for the federal government to be telling state and local governments what to display in or on their buildings. In fact, the federal government should butt out of the issue entirely, since usually they are the ones who are forcing state and local governments to remove material which references God from public buildings.

I don't know about your state, but we don't need the federal government telling us what to display in our government buildings. Nobody, not even Ron Paul, is suggesting that the motto itself is a problem. The problem is a federal government who can't leave the state and local governments and the citizens alone. And a bunch of elected representatives who would rather spend time and money voting on resolutions which don't change anything than tackling real problems - like the federal government's open hostility towards religion in public life.

The resolution itself.

31 posted on 11/04/2011 8:45:02 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Ron Paul is mentally ill.


33 posted on 11/04/2011 8:58:00 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

God offends his leftist followers. He’s got a cult going. It’s sad to see him fall so low.


34 posted on 11/04/2011 9:05:33 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
Ron Paul may be slightly crazy ,but, I have to call BS on this one. He is not that dumb!!!
36 posted on 11/04/2011 11:06:55 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (Obama is just the symptom of what is destroying the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Who cares what Ron Paul thinks?

He’s just throwing a bone to his libertarian worshipers.


37 posted on 11/04/2011 11:14:16 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson