To: Maelstorm
Bennett said that in his legal opinion, what occurred between Cain and his client met the legal definition of sexual harassment.
How ambiguous is it possible to be? So basically, to anyone with a liberal mindset and thin-skin, this may meet the "legal definition" of sexual harassment. To the rest of us, it is a pile of steaming caca de toro. He probably said he liked her earings.
8 posted on
11/04/2011 8:01:37 PM PDT by
RobertClark
("Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: RobertClark
Yep. I’ve never before seen anonymous statements be so vauge. This is a lot of second hand smoke.
10 posted on
11/04/2011 8:07:01 PM PDT by
Maelstorm
(Better to keep your enemy in your sights than in your camp expecting him to guard your back.)
To: RobertClark
Bennett said that in his legal opinion, what occurred between Cain and his client what his client said occurred between Cain and herself met the legal definition of sexual harassment. ((whistling))
31 posted on
11/04/2011 9:00:56 PM PDT by
fightinJAG
(NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson