“Cain is ahead in Iowa, SC and Florida. The article starts out with a lie, no need to read any further.”
The article is three days old, so it might not reflect all of the most recent (and fluctuating) polling. And yeah, maybe the author is selectively choosing from the various polls.
But I think the overall argument is still valid.
“But I think the overall argument is still valid.”
Which overall argument is that?
There is a concentrated effort on FR to make it look like Cain doesn’t have any ground game in these states but it is not true. In addition to his paid staff, there are thousands of volunteers in key states coordinating with his campaign.