[Travis McGee]

A ConCon would be a fatal mistake. No matter how it started, it would be hijacked by union thugs and and socialists. At the end, we would have a “constitution” like that of the old USSR, complete with a “right to a job” and the “fair” distribution of wealth.

[andy58-in-nh]

A ConCon would be a fatal mistake.

I agree with you completely. The dangers of such an undertaking in the present circumstances cannot be overestimated.

In truth, we do not need to recreate our Constitution: we need to abide by it.

[Spartan79]

A ConCon would be a fatal mistake. No matter how it started, it would be hijacked by union thugs and and socialists. At the end, we would have a “constitution” like that of the old USSR, complete with a “right to a job” and the “fair” distribution of wealth.

We have nothing to fear from a "hijacked convention". Whatever comes out of the convention must still be ratified by the states.

Bring on ConCon!

[RipSawyer]

“A ConCon would be a fatal mistake.”
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Few are able to write a short, concise sentence, totally clear in meaning and allowing for no possibility of error. Congratulations, you did it. Anyone who disagrees simply does NOT understand the issue.

[ken21]

ditto.

updating the u.s. constitution has been on the laundry list of to-do’s by leftists since i was in college.