To: celtic gal
What you are inferring is that our country is ruled purely by emotions and not by constitutional jurisprudence.
Sadly enough, you’re probably right.
7 posted on
09/28/2011 1:18:02 PM PDT by
353FMG
(Liberalism is Satan's handiwork.)
To: onyx; RedMDer; Lady Jag; The Cajun; tubebender; musicman; trisham; DJ MacWoW; vox_freedom; ...
.. Ping!
Mods, should this go in Breaking?
8 posted on
09/28/2011 1:28:11 PM PDT by
STARWISE
(The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
To: 353FMG; Hunton Peck; FlipWilson; Defiant; mtnwmn; Libloather; celtic gal; STARWISE; vigilence; ...
What you are inferring is that our country is ruled purely by emotions and not by constitutional jurisprudence. Sadly enough, you’re probably right. Given that an appeal to SCOTUS is nothing more than a flick of the game-spinner on the "How well did Anthony Kennedy sleep last night" board game, a 5-4 decision at best means constitutional jurisprudence doesn't have too damn much to do with the process.
22 posted on
09/28/2011 2:36:25 PM PDT by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson