Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On spending, Congress can't agree on easy stuff
http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2011/09/26/7965115-on-spending-congress-cant-agree-on-easy-stuff#main_grid ^ | Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:31 AM EDT | Laurie Kellman, Associated Press

Posted on 09/26/2011 11:02:31 AM PDT by ¢ommon ¢ents

WASHINGTON — Congress is once again allowing shutdown politics to bring the federal government to the brink of closing.

For the second time in nine months, lawmakers are bickering and posturing over spending plans. The difference this time is that everyone agrees on the massive barrel of money to keep the government running for another seven weeks.

<snip>

(Excerpt) Read more at newsvine.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: cr; spending
From the article:
The current standoff raises a question: If lawmakers can't even agree to help victims of natural disasters, how are they going to strike a deal to cut $1.5 trillion in spending this fall in the white-hot climate of presidential and congressional politics?

Faulty premise.

The parties agree that there should be money to help victims of natural disasters. That's not in question at all.

The parties also agreed in July on a spending cap for the year. While we didn't know at the time where all of the disasters were going to be, we did know that there would be disasters.

Now, one party wants to say that disaster aid doesn't count toward that spending cap.

Sorry, spending is spending, and a cap is a cap. If they need to spend more on disaster relief, it's fair that they spend less on something else.

Democrats are now willing to shut down the government to protect loan guarantees for "green energy" and for "alternate fuel vehicles."

This is about protecting the gravy train for engery subsidies, for auto unions, and for auto makers (especially the one mostly owned by unions and the government). What this is not about is disaster aid.

1 posted on 09/26/2011 11:02:41 AM PDT by ¢ommon ¢ents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ¢ommon ¢ents

Is this not why we (are supposed to) adhere to the Constitution?

These differences of ‘opinion’ would be irrelevant. The vote-buying would be impossible. The cronyism wouldn’t prosper.

But, hey, it’s more fun to play games with people’s lives.


2 posted on 09/26/2011 11:15:31 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Those who love liberty love Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ¢ommon ¢ents

Where is the BUDGET, Mr. President???


3 posted on 09/26/2011 11:23:12 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ¢ommon ¢ents

This is actually the third time.

The first was for the 2011 budget, which was passed late this spring.

Then there was the debt ceiling bit in Aug.

So the 2012 budget is go #3.

After all of the hoopla over the other two, less than 1% of the budget was cut.


4 posted on 09/26/2011 11:26:45 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson