Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bluff Called… Republicans Demand Buffett’s Tax Returns
Gateway Pundit ^ | 9/22/11 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 09/22/2011 5:14:31 PM PDT by Nachum

Bluff Called. Senate Republicans demanded that Warren Buffett, the namesake of Obama’s tax hikes, turn over his tax returns so they can be compared to his secretary’s returns. Buffett says his secretary pays more taxes than he does.

Bluff Called. Senate Republicans demanded that Warren Buffett, the namesake of Obama’s tax hikes, turn over his tax returns so they can be compared to his secretary’s returns. Buffett says his secretary pays more taxes than he does.

Republicans want to see Buffett’s tax returns. The Hill reported:

The GOP is making a concerted effort to pressure billionaire investment guru Warren Buffett to release his tax returns to the public.

Republicans say Buffett — the public face of Obama’s proposed “Buffett rule” to increase taxes on the wealthy — needs to reveal his finances if his views on tax rates are going to serve as the basis for Obama administration policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bluff; buffettrule; buffetts; called; tax

1 posted on 09/22/2011 5:14:39 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
buffett is a hypocrite of the first order... he is free to pay as much as he wants to in taxes, and he choses to pay the bare minimum his tax lawyers can't shield him from
2 posted on 09/22/2011 5:23:27 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Was hoping they would go for it. Should at least have knowledge of his 'charitible contributions'. A few years back, it was said that Buffet's one and favorite, donation drop off; was Planned Parenthood. . .

Should check out all those Dems as well; the ones with 'clucking tongues' over their 'tax the rich', feeding frenzy

3 posted on 09/22/2011 5:24:04 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Buffett doesn't have to approve the tax records for the Congress to see them. Subpoena them from the IRS as a part of an investigation and review them.
4 posted on 09/22/2011 5:24:10 PM PDT by tobyhill (A Democrat that doesn't lie would be a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hilarious!
Now we’ll have even more proof he’s a lying liar.


5 posted on 09/22/2011 5:27:56 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Actually, Buffet could be correct, if he is referring to the fact that he pays ~8.00% on the first $100,000 for his FFICA and Medicare tax, which is a minute amount. If his secretary pays ~8% on her total earnings of $100,000, she is indeed paying a much higher rate. He didn’t say taxes, he said rate.


6 posted on 09/22/2011 5:28:31 PM PDT by mommyq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
We already know his company owes back taxes going back to 2002. Maybe the definition of the "Buffet Rule" is "If you're rich and suck up to Obama, you won't have to pay your taxes."
7 posted on 09/22/2011 5:33:45 PM PDT by cookcounty (2012 choice: It's the Tea Party or the Slumber Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

About time.


8 posted on 09/22/2011 5:35:44 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

good.


9 posted on 09/22/2011 5:38:54 PM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He’s in arrears more than $2Billion on his OWN taxes. Why doesn’t he just write a check instead of calling everybody else “cheats?” No hypocrisy here...


10 posted on 09/22/2011 6:05:48 PM PDT by redhead (Never Forget. Never Forget. NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
If you dont pay your taxes, then what Buffet said is true. Silly fools, you took his double speak out of context!
11 posted on 09/22/2011 6:55:37 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature ($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is great.

Put up or Shut up Warren.


12 posted on 09/22/2011 6:57:48 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redhead
He’s in arrears more than $2Billion on his OWN taxes.

If true, why doesn't the IRS simply mercilessly seize and liquidate his assets like they would do with the rest of us "little" people.

Anyone in arrears to the IRS to the tune of $2 billion is in no position to lecture honest taxpayers on the subject of taxes.

13 posted on 09/22/2011 6:59:38 PM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority (Where is the middle ground on insolvency of the United States government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

I heard it was one billion, not two billion, but I could be wrong. it’s Buffet’s Berkshire-Hathaway that owes the money. Maybe Buffet is working off the money that is owed by supporting Obama and doing those ads.


14 posted on 09/22/2011 7:02:45 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The GOP finally grew a pair???!!! When will Boehner and Rove start whining about remaining civil?

To our TEA Party freshmen. Will you please keep those two losers liquered up and hidden in a back room somewhere? Didn’t Obama keep members of the press locked in a closet? That sounds like a precedent to me!


15 posted on 09/22/2011 7:03:46 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear (No More RINOs!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

We need to provide full and complete information on the tax effects.

The individual tax rate for long term capital gains and dividends is 15% and not subject to the AMT (Alternate Minimum TAX of 26 or 28%).

This income is double taxed, as it is subject to the corporate income tax at 34 to 39% (for taxable income over $100,000). Dividends are not deductible against corporate income taxes, and capital gains generally comes from profits that are taxed at the corporate level.

So stop believing that capital gains and dividends are only taxed at 15% - it is more like 50% plus.

And is is subject to triple taxation when the estate and gift tax is applied. And that doesn’t count the state income, sales, gasoline, alcohol, etc. etc taxes

President Zero and Warren Buffet are LYING for political gain.


16 posted on 09/22/2011 7:14:00 PM PDT by ADSUM (Democracy works when citizens get involved and keep government honest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Buffett says his secretary pays more taxes than he does.

He never said this. He only claimed that she paid a higher RATE. Since a lot of his income comes from dividends, which are taxed at 15%, this is not hard to believe.

17 posted on 09/22/2011 7:19:20 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
Since a lot of his income comes from dividends

Easily remedied: Stop screwing his employee by paying her in stock instead of dollars. If she's willing to take the risk with him of course..

18 posted on 09/22/2011 7:51:45 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Buffet is too busy setting up a $35,000/plate fund raiser for Obama. I wonder if Buffet’s secretary gets to go?


19 posted on 09/22/2011 9:32:35 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Easily remedied: Stop screwing his employee by paying her in stock instead of dollars. If she's willing to take the risk with him of course..

That doesn't make sense. If he paid her in stock she would have to declare the value of it as ordinary income, so if the value of the stock matched her previous dollar salary she would see no change in income tax rate. If she later sold it she could use the value at the time of transfer as the basis for computing capital gains and she would pay a lower tax rate on any capital gains she had.

Of course 1 share of Berkshire stock is worth about $100,000 (just went below yesterday!)

20 posted on 09/23/2011 10:35:55 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson