“Do you, by any chance, work for our governm.... oops, I mean, ‘Federal Family’??”
Ahhh, the typical self righteous “conservative”. Anyone who isn’t in 100% agreement with you is:
A union member
A federal worker
An escapee from the DU
What we need at FR is a variant on Godwin’s Law. Brownsfan’s Law:
The first one to call another freeper any of the above loses credibility.
>>>What we need at FR is a variant on Godwin’s Law. Brownsfan’s Law:
>>>The first one to call another freeper any of the above loses credibility.
Your opening post in the tread is evidence that you’re not qualified to judge others on your own “Law”.
I’m with you. I am tired of the “self-righteous conservatives” on here who refuse to see any point of view but their own. There are at least two sides to every story - sometimes more. And yet conservatives are always accusing liberals of being intolerant. It doesn’t hurt to get another point of view. You may even learn something.
Only a union member would suggest such a thing.
While I completely disagree with you regarding the value of brokers, your comments relative to the deportment of some posters on FR is spot on! From my experiences here, I have found that FR has it’s share of morons who are so imbued with the “correctness” of own positions that when confronted with an idea that goes counter to their thinking, they resort to name calling. I guess in a group that’s as large as FR there are going to be some mental midgets.
“The first one to call another freeper any of the above loses credibility.”
Sorry, but you were the first. Baaaaant!!!
Ah the typical Nasty Sarcastic troll that complains with deep insults and long straw men letters when anyone points out a foolish position.
What we need on FR is a little manners, you know, civility and free discussion.
>>at we need at FR is a variant on Godwin’s Law. Brownsfan’s Law:<<
Been on a Gov. Palin or Gov. Perry thread lately?
In the meantime, we are all waiting for your definition of “worker.” Based on your comments so far, it is “someone who makes something.”
Are you standing by this 16th century definition?