I think there is absolutely no chance of any of this getting investigated by the press or by Congress. There may be a few modest inquiries (such as Issa’s investigation) but they’re not going to attract much attention outside of FR and nothing will come of them.
It is quite possible that a lot of the Dems are worried about Bambi’s election chances and hope that something will happen to prevent him from running again, but I think there’s another factor here, and that’s fear. Obama has shown himself to be completely ruthless in destroying people and institutions.
In addition, this is the guy with the nuclear codes and full command of the US military - but absolutely no loyalty to the United States. I think they all know that the only focus of Obama’s loyalty is himself, and that he would turn on us in an instant if he felt threatened.
He seems to have little regard for national security .
“...the only focus of Obama’s loyalty is himself...”
One wonders of the base is still loving that Hope and Change thing.
Just asking.
I have been thinking for a while that there must be some kind of threat involved. It is inconcievable to me that there are not enough good people left in our legislative, judicial and military bodies that this destruction is allowed to continue. A threat is the only thing that makes sense. A threat that they believe Obama, or whoever his puppeteer is, is capable of carrying out. Dark forces are hard at work. PRAY
Correct.
Woodstein was peripheral to the factors that moved Watergate. The two reporters were tools in the hands of the movers, that's all.
1) There's no James McCord.
2) There's no Mark Felt.
3) There's no Sam Ervin.
4) There's (especially) no Howard Baker.
5) And, there's no Peter Rodino.
For reasons not yet entirely clear, a community of interest arose (or was disclosed) among certain Washington insiders who wanted Nixon gone. This community of interest included Republicans and Democrats, but it especially included CIA (McCord) and FBI (Felt) who understood that there was a permanent government which could not be dislodged or disrupted by the strange little man from Whittier.
I also believe that they wanted to avoid (and went to great lengths to avoid) a repeat of the events of 1963.
If and when the ruling class decides that they've had enough of the man who calls himself "Obama", I don't think they will use the Watergate model.