Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ThirstyMan
I think the situation is that "new money made new rules." The latest round of investors wants to make sure they are cared for first. I have a feeling that this always happens when earlier investors need help from new money.

While I can't be certain that it's the situation, I think it was more a case of "the government" (i.e. the current administration) wanting to protect its campaign contributors.

7 posted on 09/17/2011 10:07:41 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Bob

If the deal in question was a pure restructure without further investment (new money) then that’d be true.


9 posted on 09/17/2011 10:29:45 PM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson