Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clairity

If they all had their primaries on the SAME day, we wouldn’t have to worry about it! We have 1 voting day for the FULL election, so why all this whoohaw about different voting days for primaries - Say make it March 1st for EVERYONE! Get it all overwith in 1 day....


2 posted on 09/17/2011 3:20:56 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: princess leah
I like your idea but I would hold two "national" primaries. One in March and another in June.

The March primaries would be more or less a weeding-out affair. Candidates with say, at least 20% of the vote, would move on to the June primaries in which delegates will be awarded to candidates accordingly to take to their national conventions for the formal nomination process.

Now when I say "national" primaries, I am really saying 50 separate state primaries - which happen to be held on the same day. This is so we can preserve the Electoral College.

8 posted on 09/17/2011 3:30:46 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (All my replies get posted to AttackWatch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: princess leah
Not only that but how about those states that allow crossover voters. That's how we got McShame in many of those states. The worse one running. Of course dems would like the Reps to have the weakest candidate that way.
9 posted on 09/17/2011 3:30:55 PM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: princess leah

Can you make it March 2nd? I’m busy the 1st. Thank you.


10 posted on 09/17/2011 3:34:27 PM PDT by Krankor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: princess leah
We have 1 voting day for the FULL election, so why all this whoohaw about different voting days for primaries...

The ruling-class RINOs have to have way of controlling things, or some "rogue" candidate (anybody come to mind) might outwit and outmaneuver them.

Not mentioning any names, of course.

19 posted on 09/17/2011 4:15:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: princess leah
If they all had their primaries on the SAME day, we wouldn’t have to worry about it! We have 1 voting day for the FULL election, so why all this whoohaw about different voting days for primaries - Say make it March 1st for EVERYONE! Get it all overwith in 1 day....

But...but...what if Sarah hasn't announced by March 1st?

20 posted on 09/17/2011 4:19:54 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: princess leah
I'm not in favor of a same day primary because the nomination process is supposed to be a marathon and not a sprint.

A better way to control the race to be first is formulating extra delegates to states which go later. You'd eventually achieve a natural equilibrium between attention whore states and deliberative states.

27 posted on 09/17/2011 7:01:43 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson