Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 09/15/2011 7:17:47 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

dupe: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2778709/posts



Skip to comments.

Cancer victim's friends come to Perry's defense [Gardasil]
KTRK-TV, Local Houston ABC affiliate ^ | 14 Sep 2011 | Ted Oberg

Posted on 09/15/2011 6:50:34 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Texas Governor Rick Perry is still taking heat for a controversial executive order he issued four years ago. It mandated that all 11- and 12-year-old girls be vaccinated for human papillomavirus, or HPV, a sexually transmitted virus that can cause cervical cancer. The now-overturned order is becoming a big issue in Perry's presidential campaign.

Governor Perry is taking a lot of criticism for the vaccine decision. The most damage seems to be due to the suggestion he forced a vaccine on 12-year-old girls to help a political donor.

The donor is Mike Toomey, a longtime friend and Perry's two-time chief of staff. Toomey has given $41,000 in campaign contributions to Perry while Perry has been governor. Only $9,000 of that was given before the HPV vaccine decision was made, though.

At the time Perry signed the executive order, Toomey was a lobbyist for the vaccine's manufacturer, Merck. Merck is the only worldwide manufacturer of Gardasil, the HPV vaccine. Merck, through its political action committee, has given $39,500 to Perry -- $22,000 of that before the decision.

It's a lot of money, but Governor Perry had raised tens of millions of dollars during this time. While his critics are saying the decision was motivated by politics and money, we found a Houston family that says another possible motivation was far more personal...

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS:
Still don't think that mandating vaccines for less communicable diseases is liberty friendly, but the article does go beyond the usual trite discussion that surrounds this issue on FR.
1 posted on 09/15/2011 6:50:36 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; shield

Ping for your interest.


2 posted on 09/15/2011 6:51:22 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus ("A gentleman considers what is just; a small man considers what is expedient.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I thought Perry said he only got $5,000.


3 posted on 09/15/2011 6:54:22 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

He must have only meant the money that he got when he met with Merck on the same day he signed the executive order.

He probably forgot the rest.


4 posted on 09/15/2011 6:55:32 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (Perry's idea of border control: Use both hands while driving truckloads of illegals over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

This is good too!

http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sat/2011/09/14/a-shot-of-reality-about-young-womens-health/


5 posted on 09/15/2011 6:56:30 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Just finished watching the video story.

It is so very touching.

I can only imagine the thoughts going though Gov. Perry’s mind and the hurt in his heart for this woman while Michele Bachmann was launching her assault on him (one that she so enjoyed repeating over again for each interview).


6 posted on 09/15/2011 7:07:51 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

According to the author, George W. Bush is “not known for his philanthropy.” That may just mean that he doesn’t try to draw attention to it. (See Matthew 6.1-4.)


7 posted on 09/15/2011 7:09:58 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

This is not about whether cancer is bad or whether Gardisil works as advertised. It is about freedom and individual choice. And about people with vested financial interests paying politicians to take away that choice.


8 posted on 09/15/2011 7:13:22 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I’d rather see Perry explain his opposition to Arizona’s SB 1070.


9 posted on 09/15/2011 7:14:11 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Yes.

Both Bush and Perry have done philanthropic work that isn’t plastered all over the front page or accounted for by counting what went into the offering plate at church.


10 posted on 09/15/2011 7:14:46 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson