Put yourself in the Governor’s office, hypothetically.
Would you be willing to let a large segment of the population—young girls—be subjected to the risks of this vaccine? Just to feed some of the local crony capitalism?
Don’t you think a normal person would say not just no, but hell no? What does it say about his character?
>>be subjected to the risks of this vaccine?<<
What risks? So far, everything I have seen says this is one of the safest vaccines ever.
Note I am concentrating on your comment about the risk, not on whether the Government should or should not have created the program.
Please stop the nonsense! I live in Texas, and I know of a lot of young girls who are sexually active. I also know of some in the their early twenties who have had cervical cancer. The governor had sound reasons to want the vaccine but went about it the wrong way. I didn’t like the idea of a mandate. The governor has admitted that it was a bad decision and apologized for it. He has said that he was wrong. Anyone who brings this up is just trying to attack Perry. I don’t care if he becomes president, but I do care if he gets fair treatment. They brought this up again and again and again during the his primary with Kay Bailey Hutchinson, and you know who won. If you want Perry to get the nonmination, keep attacking him for silly reasons.
“Just to feed some of the local crony capitalism?”
This sounds like a Democrat talking point from DU...
Rick Perry’s special interest in this :
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news%2Fin_focus&id=8354519
I’d just love to hear your explanation of the vaccination schedules of the 50 states.
Lets start with Hep B and infants.