Oh good grief. It’s one of the leading cancer treatment and research centers in the world.
According to you M.D. Anderson is an unethical medical center because they want to PREVENT cancer?
You have no boundaries do you?
“M.D. Anderson is apparently VOID OF ETHICS.”
Maybe Jeff Head can weight in on your opinion, Diogenesis.
Please stop trolling on Perry threads. Thank You.
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM094042
Rick Perry isn’t presidential material, but you’re wrong.
If you get Cancer, you might want to BEG M.D. Anderson to take you as a patient.
Noteworthy
MD Anderson is accredited by the Joint Commission, the organization that ensures that patients receive the best and safest health care possible
Our nursing program holds Magnet Nursing Services Recognition status from the American Nurses Credentialing Center
For seven of the past nine years, including 2010, MD Anderson has ranked No. 1 in cancer care in the Americas Best Hospitals survey published by U.S. News & World Report
MD Anderson provided $326 million in unsponsored charity care to Texans with cancer in FY10. This figure includes charges for care provided to patients who participate in MD Anderson-sponsored charity care programs or whose treatment was not fully covered by Medicaid.
I think you are void of ethics.
And quite childish at times.
"Foaming at the mouth, shock, seizures, paralysis, coma-even death have been reportedas a result of taking the vaccine Gardasil from Merckby Palin supporters as result of watching Perry lead the pack of GOP contenders... "
Are you aware that the source of your information, at least the first link, is from Alex Jones, the Prison Planet? I could not find the government report to which he referred. Perhaps others can.
Your figures show an adverse effect rate of .0535%. Is that considered high? 68 deaths from 35,000,000 doses seems statistically insignificant.
If you actually bother to read the info on the site you link, you will find that 92% of those were non-serious. Of the serious reactions, NONE were proven to be a result of the vaccine.
VAERS data cannot be used to prove a causal association between the vaccine and the adverse event. The only association between the adverse event and vaccination is temporal, meaning that the adverse event occurred sometime after vaccination. Therefore, the adverse event may be coincidental or it may have been caused by vaccination, however we cannot make any conclusions that the events reported to VAERS were caused by the vaccine.