The Conscience of a Liberal, The Years of Shame

The New York Time ^ | 09/11/11 | Paul Krugman

[Dudoight]

Is it just me, or are the 9/11 commemorations oddly subdued?

Actually, I don’t think it’s me, and it’s not really that odd.

[Dudoight]

This man's comments just takes my breath away. I was shocked beyond belief.

[Dudoight]

Was this man raised by lizards? Or snakes? Where does he come from?

[CitizenUSA]

I’m no fan of President Bush, but to claim Bush rushed to cash in on 9/11??? That’s delusional!

[dhs12345]

He’s a nut.

[yup2394871293]

I’m waiting for the 11.5th anniversary.

[Uri’el-2012]

Paul Krugman is speaking the words of Satan !

[Outraged At FLA]

He says “Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror.” Yet that article is plastered with advertisements.. How much did Krugman just earn on that article me wonders?

Also: “I’m not going to allow comments on this post, for obvious reasons.” The reason being that he is a hypocritical ahole.. BIGTIME!

[yup2394871293]

Liberals cherish their delusions more than anything else. They hate the real world, but I think they prefer hating the unreal world.

[Chode]

RATS have no Conscience or Shame... that's what makes them RATs!

[Calusa]

What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful

How could someone possibly, ever find 'common ground' with such a statement. Not likely.

[chris_bdba]

Much like he is a fake newsman.... Notice they are to allowing comments on this today....

[MarkL]

Paul Krugman is the perfect example of over-education and a hyper-inflated ego. He won a Nobel prize, which I place in the same category of presenting the prize to Arafat and Obama.

While he may have all sorts of academic awards, he has no moral center, nor conscience. He is amoral.

Mark

[ArchAngel1983]

" He says “Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror.”

Yet I remember the libs openly lamenting the attack didn't happen under Clinton's watch. I loath these people!

[Lockbox]

Hey Paul, your wife gets violently raped, do you turn the other cheek or call the police to arrest the criminals? Sorry to have to sink to this personal example but when you fail to understand an act of war, well then it’s either this or the 2X4.

[Noob1999]

Unfortunately, Biffy and Buffy Mushhead at Princeton listen to their esteemed professors like Krugman, Blinder, Krueger, and just nod their heads in agreement, brainwashed for life as a Rat.

[clintonh8r]

"I'm not allowing comments for obvious reasons."

That you're a fascist thug coward who cannot accept criticism is the most "obvious reason."

[avenir]

"I’m not going to allow comments on this post, for obvious reasons."

Well fancy that.

[hsalaw]

Disgusting tripe from a delusional POS.

[Pontiac]

What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful

Oh I think he is correct.

The way the Left acted about a year after the attack was truly shameful.

After the Left figured out how to make political hay out of the war on terror they used it to demonize and harass President Bush and his administration. Even actions that Democratic congressional leader signed off on and openly supported were twisted around and made to appear horrible in the press by those same Democratic congressional leader.

But those on the Left are with out shame and willfully blind to their own despicable acts.

[Polyxene]

“I’m not going to allow comments on this post, for obvious reasons.”

Guess what, Paul? The First Amendment is alive and well on FR! Typical Lib-Socialist — free speech for me, but not for thee.