I assume the plane was not so much forced down
as it chose to return to a known safe point
by non-GPS techniques
Misleading Headline?
10-4
The use of the term “forced down” is an obvious embellishment. They probably turned back and landed thinking it was an on-board avionics problem.
Yes there are multiple backups - worse case scenario they go above the clouds and shoot celestial navigation. Buddy of mine was an airforce bomber pilot - they had to assume those conditions in training all the time.
I’m Navy and the first thing to go in any refresher training course was GPS (then Loran, etc I know I’m dating myself with that). Then all the officers and quartermasters who knew how to shoot bearings and plot. Somehow in reftra we always ended up a burning hulk adrift with not a single NCO or Officer in charge. I used to enjoy walking around in my “zombie” state teaching and helping sailors with this and that thing they’d never worked on before. Good times. Was the best part of being in the service...though I always questioned if the training always ended up that way would they be so ingrained to it that they would ‘zombify’ on cue in a real attack - LOL.
“..Misleading Headline?.. Do not navigators learn to navigate without GPS?..”
I certainly hope so, eg dead reckoning, celestial, radar, local area noon, etc. But maybe we’re so screwed up like today’s education system where we have to use calculators to do square roots or long division.
Certainly, some form of tactical or strategic retaliation (jam their radar, screw up their satellites, etc.) was in order, but as another poster said, the pubic public doesn’t have a need to know about this.
I thought the same thing. GPS went down, plane went home to find out why.
We should still blow the locations of the jammers out of ground though.