[Baladas]

Well, Rick Perry is ahead in the polls, so even a libertarian party candidate of the millenium like Ron Paul will try to tear him down. That debate next week ought to be a hoot, with both of them there.

[Perdogg]

Ron Paul is the Ralph Nader of the Republican party.

[Wiser now]

I was thinking this generation’s Adlai Stevenson.

[Nonstatist]

"He was the one saying, ‘Oh yeah, I’m all for secession,’ and that kind of talk"

Yea, God forbid Ron Paul should say something "crazy".

[Proud2BeRight]

And Ron Paul is the “candidate of the weak”.

[SaxxonWoods]

There’s nothing wrong with a little elbowing at this stage of the campaign, that’s politics.

Perry’s problem is Bush baggage. It’s not deserved, but that doesn’t matter in politics. We’ll see how Perry can do with working past that.

Paul’s problem is that he is the most popular candidate around among people who don’t vote. Oh, and he’s like 119 years old.

[skr]

Whereas Ron Paul is the perennial presidential candidate wannabe.

[Tempest]

I wonder which of Rick Perry’s far left policies has got Paul so upset. I thought that they shared some similar nutty polices.

[NoLibZone]

Ron Paul replaced Pat Paulsen.

[dusttoyou]

In the Texas Gov debate, Perry enabled ronpaul’s sweety-pie Truther Deb Medina out herself quite nicely. Expect similar next week. Paul will be out of his league more than usual. Maybe RP will have some Sex with Perry exposers from his shitty little ad.

[Verginius Rufus]

Texas has seceded twice. It worked the first time (1836). It didn’t work the second time (1861).

[rightwingintelligentsia]

And Ron Paul is the candidate of the century. The 18th century, that is.