Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
Perry just dropped like a rock, in my mind, hearing about Ken Crow and the games he played trying to mess Palin up.

Even if we grant your assumptions that A) Crow was a Perry supporter and B) he was trying to mess Palin up (neither of which is proven to my knowledge), what does that have to do with Perry himself? If we are going to judge the candidates by what their supporters do, then I could never support Sarah even if she got the nomination, simply due to the behavior of her supporters here on FR.

16 posted on 09/02/2011 7:45:18 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

I absolutely vote on the supporters of a candidate, not the candidate itself. The candidate is completely unimportant in any given race. The important consideration is who supports them.


20 posted on 09/02/2011 7:47:47 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If Hitler had been as lazy as Obama, the 1940's would have been a very nice decade!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative

POT / KETTLE = your idiot post is not helpful.


31 posted on 09/02/2011 7:55:08 AM PDT by onyx (If you enjoy FR, support it! If you support Sarah Palin & want on her Busy Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative

Even if Crow is a Perry supporter, and that’s questionable...he could be a covert Gingrich supporter trying to hurt Perry for all we know...but even if he was a perry supporter, that doesn’t mean that perry gave an order to mess up palin.

And, if we blame Perry for a bad supporter, then we have to blame every candidate every time on of their supporters does something out of line. That’s an impossible standard.


40 posted on 09/02/2011 8:00:32 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative

The delay thing has hurt Sarah. It is the only thing many even have against her, because it told us some time ago that she wasn’t running. Now comes The Undefeated which broke nationally last night on PPV. I watched it and it was a BRAVO watch! Now I have decided that the release of that documentary MAY have been what all this dang delay was about, to see if its release boosts her negatives. It may. It was inspiring, of course. I wonder if it came too late. The incessant delay made so many disgusted that by now they might not watch it. I say the results will be in, on the movie, in 10-14 days and she will get in, or decline. Either way she will be all over the US fighting the good fight for the nominee because that is for sure her calling. She may give ‘em hell in 2016, but if trends hold Rubio will be the one to beat also.

As for Perry, blaming him for some clod kicker’s enthusiasm
in Iowa is still ridiculous. Heck, Rick is probably just now even hearing about the SP dust up with O’Donnell, given his own schedule. Sarah needs to calm the waters or light the fire herself. And soon.


143 posted on 09/02/2011 9:24:16 AM PDT by RitaOK (TEXAS. It's EXHIBIT A for Rick. Perry/Rubio '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson