Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skr
I know, let’s have something called a primary and see what those poll results are.

No way. Polls are amazingly prescient 8 months from the primaries or 15 months from the election. Why look at how Rudy swept the field last time, Or how Hillary was going to be the dem nominee, or how Trump was the frontrunner a few months ago. Dukakis was unbeatable, Reagan couldn't win, Mc Cain was the only one who could beat Hillary. Get with the program dude (or dudette), it's all done, the votes are already cast.

It's obvious you don't know how good these polls can be..................../s

26 posted on 08/29/2011 2:46:31 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark

The difference is that Palin is far better known nationally than most would-be candidates, and STILL fails to break 40 - 42% vs. Obama.


34 posted on 08/29/2011 2:52:54 PM PDT by RockinRight (The ObamAA+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Polls are amazingly prescient 8 months from the primaries or 15 months from the election. Why look at how Rudy swept the field last time, Or how Hillary was going to be the dem nominee, or how Trump was the frontrunner a few months ago. Dukakis was unbeatable, Reagan couldn't win,

Go look up polling results for Republican candidates from August '99 and see who the front-runner was.

57 posted on 08/29/2011 3:08:14 PM PDT by Gena Bukin (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson