To: ilovesarah2012
Yes, Bush was wrong to run up the debt.
But Bush’s fiscal folly is statistical noise next to what 0bamao and his sycophant congress did from 2009 to 2011.
2 posted on
08/25/2011 5:06:50 AM PDT by
Westbrook
To: ilovesarah2012
By the end of Bush’s 2nd term we were 9T in debt?
3 posted on
08/25/2011 5:13:42 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(Today is already the tomorrow which the bad economist yesterday urged us to ignore. - HAZLITT)
To: ilovesarah2012
Funny how DemocRATS were unable to stop President Bush from spending so wildly but just a handful of Tea Partiers are “hostage takers” who want to shut down the government if they don’t get their way on spending cuts.
4 posted on
08/25/2011 5:16:39 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: ilovesarah2012
Just keep on talking you only have 15 more months then you can start working on your Library ole Purple lips.
5 posted on
08/25/2011 5:19:47 AM PDT by
Rappini
(Pro Deo et Patria)
To: ilovesarah2012
I guess they changed things somewhere along the line. I always thought spending bills originated in the Congress and then went to the President to be signed. Hmmm...did Bush change that part of the Constitution?
6 posted on
08/25/2011 5:28:59 AM PDT by
econjack
(Some people are dumber than soup.)
To: ilovesarah2012
Spending trillions for me, but not for thee...in half the time no less!
To: ilovesarah2012
Perhaps as we eat our peas the prezidoodle will be eating his words.
10 posted on
08/25/2011 6:49:58 AM PDT by
ruesrose
(It's possible to be clueless without being blonde.)
To: ilovesarah2012
Perhaps as we eat our peas the prezidoodle will be eating his words.
11 posted on
08/25/2011 6:49:58 AM PDT by
ruesrose
(It's possible to be clueless without being blonde.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson