Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBryan1

You are completely wrong. One, there is no eividence connecting them to the crime. There is DNA evidence tying one of the boys’ stepfather to the crime scene. His own exwife, and mother of one of the victims, is convinced her ex did it.

The father you state wants them out so he can kill them has since apologized and said he was ashamed of how he acted in the past. He now says he is convinced these three had nothing to do with it.

This was the case of a inept small town police department getting a conviction based on an underage retarded kid’s forced confession.


7 posted on 08/19/2011 8:31:22 AM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

I still believe the stepfather is responsible.


10 posted on 08/19/2011 8:34:52 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross
One, there is no eividence connecting them to the crime

Hey genius, they are going to plead guilty to 1st degree murder of the three boys sometime today.

12 posted on 08/19/2011 8:35:46 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (Forget the Lawyers....first kill the journalists! - Die Ritter, die sagen, nee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross

Yes, IIRC the primary “evidence” against them was their infatuation with the occult and they listened to the wrong sort of music.


13 posted on 08/19/2011 8:35:55 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross

You are right! This was a miscarriage of justice as I’ve ever seen. These boys are innocent!


21 posted on 08/19/2011 8:46:12 AM PDT by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross

I believe most recently, that the DNA actually was not tied to the stepfather either.

It’s most likely the dude covered in blood in the restroom bathroom.

Echols was a 15 year old punk, but not a murderer.


27 posted on 08/19/2011 8:55:47 AM PDT by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross

Underage borderline mentally disabled kid. You are 100% right. I am a conservative orthodox Catholic who fully believes in their innocence. I believe this because the evidence does not add up to the supported facts of the case.


39 posted on 08/19/2011 9:25:51 AM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross

I’m glad to see someone else has been keeping up with this case and realizes this is one time when celebrities got it right.

Not only was the step-fathers DNA found his best friends DNA was also found - his hairs were found inside the ligatures that were used to tie two of the boys up.

Now, the parents of all three of the boys now believe the WM3 are innocent and are on their side, they are now asking the state to release them and reopen the investigation.

Plus, there is now even more damning evidence against the Step-father. His step-son always carried with him a pocket knife that had belonged to his grandfather. The knife was not recovered at the scene, was not in his room or in the home. The step-father maintained for years that he had no idea where the knife was. It was assume to have been lost during the murders or was taken by the murderer as a souvenir. Years later, the knife was found with the step-fathers possessions. His story now is that he was concerned his step-son would get hurt and took the knife from him.

He also claims that he did not see his step-son on the day of the murders. That is contradicted by two neighbors who saw him not only with his step-son but also with two of the boys who were killed. He was also seen by another person with his step-son. No wonder his ex-wife believes he is the one who actually killed her son.

There is so much more with this case, like the expert who testified about Satanic Ritual Abuse literally had a mail order degree from a non-credentialed university to the juror foreman admitting he told other jurors information that had been provided to him (and not testified to in court) by the prosecutor. He also admits he already believed in the boys guilt even before being called for the jury and admits he did everything to sway other jurors to convict.

This case stinks from one end to the other but there sure is no evidence that the three sitting in prison, one on death row, had anything to do with the murders of those three boys. Sadly, as bad as the state screwed up the guilty will never pay for three horrific murders, at least in this life.


45 posted on 08/19/2011 9:39:44 AM PDT by Brytani (Liberals - destroying America since 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross

There is no DNA evidence trying him to the crime, one of his hairs was found in the tired shoe of his kid. However, one of the perverts, told the cops where the knife was they used and they found it. Now that is evidence.


66 posted on 08/19/2011 10:07:20 AM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson