Show me where I said anything like that. I said this is what the prosecution said happened with the blood sample and the jury didn’t buy it.
Nice to know you know the mind of every juror who ever reached a verdict. Man, you must be smart. You should run for president. You could have Biden as your veep.
I was hoping to learn the way it was “easy” for a cop to plant DNA evidence.
I go away disappointed.
But damned if I will ever smoke a cigarette around a cop! ;) I know a LEO followed a suspect and picked a discarded butt up off the ground - and they got a saliva match based upon that.
But this was a case - as is most common - where they HAVE DNA - but they don't have a match. They had a suspect - but not enough evidence to subpoena DNA. The court ruled that the suspect had no expectation of privacy regarding his DNA on a improperly discarded cigarette butt.
All unwarranted acrimony aside - I still would like to know how a cop can “easily” plant DNA evidence.
One thing about the OJ blood sample hypothesis is that such samples are preserved in a liquid state via anticoagulants - it would be quite detectable on any subsequent blood spots at a crime scene - if it was tested for.
So even if they had a vial of OJ blood to contaminate the crime scene with - it would itself be ‘contaminated’ with anticoagulants.