Too much too young? New French lingerie label Jours Apres Lunes is designed for girls aged between four and 12
Posted on 08/18/2011 9:55:53 AM PDT by null and void
The shots feature young girls in poses and styling that seem far too premature for their ages.
Too much too young? New French lingerie label Jours Apres Lunes is designed for girls aged between four and 12
In one shot, a girl wears Jackie O-style sunglasses while lounging back on a pillow, her modesty protected by just panties and a cropped polka-dot tied top.
Fashionista, which broke the story, says: 'What’s disturbing about Jours Après Lunes is... that it’s lingerie for people who probably shouldn’t be old enough to even know what lingerie is.'
The label also includes a range for babies and another for older teenagers and ladies, or 'femmes'. The 'unsettling' styling sees a grown model 'made to look like a child, while the actual children are made to look like adults,' according to the site.
The 'loungerie' underwear is sold 'to be worn over and under, inside and outside,' says the collection's designer, who credits herself with being the first designer brand dedicated to ‘loungerie’ for children and teenagers.
'These pictures are not cute. It's entirely inappropriate to put a four-year-old in a bouffant like she's Brigitte Bardot'
'It's cute when a little girl dresses up in her mom's clothing and jewelry and high heels.
'These pictures are not cute. It's entirely inappropriate to put a 4-year-old in a bouffant like she's Brigitte Bardot in And God Created Woman.
'It's inappropriate to sexualize children. A pearl-encrusted triangle bra on a little girl does not sit well with me.'
The Jours Après Lunes photographs are reminiscent of a Thylane Blondeau shoot for Vogue that just last week whipped up a global storm over the 10-year-old's languid poses for the Tom Ford-edited January edition of French Vogue.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Days After Moons? Must lose something in the translation.
The fashion industry is outraged?
You mean all of the 80 pound models, freakish clothing that hide less than clear plastic wrap, creepy gay designers, and gratuitous parting didn’t foreshadow this type of thing happening?
Fashionista, which broke the story, says: ‘What’s disturbing about Jours Après Lunes is... that it’s lingerie for people who probably shouldn’t be old enough to even know what lingerie is.’
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Whatever. What Fashionista needs to know is that they - and their industry - is satiated with homo perverts who print crap like this to appeal to pedophiles.
I really don’t know what to think about this.I suppose it will be all the rage in Japan.
Looks like child porn. What would be the point of this? How do parents allow this? They should be in jail.
there is a sweet looking beautiful 10 year old model..that is being sexed up in France
http://www.front-row-view.com/2011/08/10-year-old-model-thylane-lena-rose.html
Everyone involved should be put on a watch list and wiretapped. Years ago, I heard a late night radio show interview a guy who claimed to be part of an international governmental organization that assassinated pedophiles. I didn’t really believe the guys story, but I wanted to.
Sick SOBs! Yeah, I bet the “fashion industry” is all upset about it. If they make a penny off this, they’ll be the first ones to jump into the dung heap.
they won’t go anywhere if the parents don’t buy them. It’s up to the moms and dads to stop this insanity. The vile minds that would even think to exploit children like this are beyond help, heart and God. So, we won’t waste time on the likes of them. They are LOST ALREADY.
So Moms and Dads...what’s it gonna be? Are ya gonna think this is cute and innocent and buy them putting money into the pockets of people who could even begin to imagine a promotion such as this? OR do the moms and dads stand tall and refuse to purchase trash such as this for a four year old child?
It’s up to them... let’s see how the parents deal with this.
The French women slept with Nazies and now they are preparing new sacrifices and future brides for the rag heads and sand fly fascists pedophiles invading the country.
it will be bad enough if parents buy these for their children. It is worse for the parents of these little models who allow it from the beginning.
It is not the fault of the company although they are without a lot of things. It is the fault of the parents who buy these things. I’m anxious to see how the sales go. They will go nowhere and will send a message strong and clear if the parents go back to being parents and rebuke this kind of trash.
Yeah, I fully understand!
I really cannot say what I’m thinking right now due to site rules and federal laws, but if an asteroid landed on these pedophiles I would not cry.
These fashion-designer perverts have for decades been laughing all the way to the bank, as women pay good money to be uglified. They’ve made a laughingstock of our wives, mothers, sisters, and daughters.
Now they want us to lust after little girls. Why am I not surprised?
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
More pedophile chic. Not just ten year olds, now four year olds are made up with sexy looking makeup and little pearl encrusted "bras". Most of the comments I read were rightfully disgusted with this, but some are examples of why we're heading south in a handbasket. Here's one:
I think its very tasteful and expressive of beauty. there are to many filthy minded people, any time a teen or pre-teen puts on anything pretty ... swimwear or cute sleeping clothing. its a part of life, something to have fun with and celebrate with your daughter .. i would definatly buy some of these cute things, providing the price was inline with my budget... 50 years ago women couldn't even wear swimwear to the beach .... it was the same stupid minded people that try to put a dirty twist on everything.. shame on everyone who posted that trash below.
The "filthy trash" was people who didn't like the idea of children tarted up to appeal to the prurient interest of adults. This freaking idiot thinks women could not wear bathing suits to the beach 50 years ago? And the idiot is from Canada, not Saudi Arabia!
This is, along with so much in the "entertainment" industry and sex-ed in schools, designed to soften up kids to think of themselves as sex objects, so pedophiles can have their way. The slide into the abyss continues apace and will not stop - UNTIL IT IS FORCEFULLY STOPPED. There is not low, no depth of depravity that is too hateful, disgusting and evil that these people will not only "embrace" but force it on everyone else for our own good. And then tell us that we are the Evil ones, as they make plans to lower the age of consent, and legalize pedophilia.
I’m with you 100%, Norm Lenhart. I’d put on my dancing shoes actually.
NOBODY TELL SCOTT RITTER!
NOBODY TELL SCOTT RITTER!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.