[org.whodat]

Wrong, and you can look it up, when ever you wish. Perry's statements about ethanol was wonderful was made when he was agriculture commissioner, what ever that is.

[HerrBlucher]

Wrong, and you can look it up, when ever you wish.

LOL. If you had a legitimate argument you would post references to support it but since you do not have those references one can only conclude that you are making it up. Gee what a surprise.

Perry's statements about ethanol was wonderful was made when he was agriculture commissioner, what ever that is.

What does that have to do with supporting AGW? One can support alternative fuels for conservation of natural resources, without buying into the AGW garbage.

Your posts never make any sense at all. Gee what a surprise.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

Perry in Iowa ON ETHANOL SUBSIDIES: “Obviously the subsidies on ethanol are going to be moving out of there. It’s a mature industry. And so the oil and gas industry has tax incentives. We need all the different energy sources that we can have out there. So let’s have the conversation about which of these are really the most appropriate ones for us to have in this country. … Do you go away from a subsidy program to a tax incentive program?” Source