Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited

I am too. I cannot even get my head around the concept that people would think that sexual activities with an infant would be acceptable.

They may not say this here, but it is fair. Okay. You think sex with 16 year olds is fine. How about 15? Yes? How about 14? 13? 12? No? Okay, what is the difference between a 13 year old and a 12 year old? I suspect they would not balk at all until at the very minimum the age of six. Just a gut feeling. If you say “Okay, what is the difference between a 7 and 6 year old? Why do you draw the line there?”

This is beyond appalling. It is sick, sick, sick. If we, as a society, cannot deal with people like this in a uniform, united manner, we are lost, completely lost.

I just cannot believe this.


12 posted on 08/15/2011 9:29:33 AM PDT by rlmorel ("When marching down the same road, one doesn't need 'marching orders' to reach the same destination")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

Even mohammed drew the line at 9...


13 posted on 08/15/2011 9:31:52 AM PDT by null and void (Day 934. The mob is decisive when the law is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel
It's a slippery slope to limitless depravity. The more socially acceptable and superficially more attractive forms of sexual immorality serve to open the door to all sorts of evil.
18 posted on 08/15/2011 9:41:53 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson