Posted on 08/02/2011 9:18:42 AM PDT by nbenyo
In an increasingly familiar pattern of the federal government challenging tough new state immigration laws, the U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit on Monday in an effort to halt an Alabama measure that has been described as the toughest in the nation.
(Excerpt) Read more at ibtimes.com ...
Consider this and understand, I don’t agree with everything these guys did, but on this subject, they were right on:
THREE PRESIDENTS (both parties)...
with the strength to do what was right
for AMERICA
No one in either party today has the courage to do this.
Three Presidents...
What did Presidents Hoover , Truman, & Eisenhower have in common?
This is something that should be of great interest for you to pass around. I didn’t know of this until it was pointed out to me.
Back during the great depression, Herbert Hoover ordered the deportation of ALL illegal aliens in order to make jobs available to American citizens that desperately needed work.
Harry Truman deported over two million illegal aliens after WWII to create jobs for returning veterans.
In 1954, Dwight Eisenhower deported 13-M Mexicans.The program was called Operation Wetback. It was done so WWII & Korean veterans would have a better chance at jobs. It took two years, but they deported them!
Now, if they could deport the illegal aliens back then, they could sure do it today. If you have doubts about the veracity of this information, enter Operation Wet-back into your favorite search engine & confirm it for yourself.
Why, you might ask, can’t they do this today? Actually, the answer is quite simple. Hoover, Truman, & Eisenhower were men of honor, not untrustworthy politicians pandering for votes!
Reminder:Don’t forget to pay your taxes, 12 to 20 million illegal aliens are depending on you!
=
Alabama should counter sue over Project Gunrunner/fast and furious/castaway.
“If you aren’t enforcing your own laws, why can’t we enforce our laws?” All 57 states
“We aren’t enforcing federal immigration laws, and we don’t want you enforcing them.
“Why?”
“Because we’re the federal government and, as always, we’re here to help.” Eric Holder
It astounds me that an elected POTUS would sue states. This is Obama’s world. He is a POS that is not going to be reelected.
Do you think Obama could save some federal money if he stopped suing the states?
nice catch RC2
1. To provide a stable monetary system, and protect dealings between our peoples, with enforceable contracts based upon uniform measures & stable money. (Obama has certainly done what he can to destroy that.)
2. To have a common defense against foreign nations. (Once again, Obama takes the side of foreign nationals against native Americans.)
If I were a Congressman from Alabama, my staff would be preparing a Bill of Impeachment for introduction when the House reconvenes. The Demagogue in chief either does not understand where duty lies, or he is so committed to International Socialism, that he does not care.
William Flax
Ping!
He’s keeping the US Justice Department’s lawyers fully employed. Probably the only area he can make such a claim.
bump
Perhaps I have lived a life with my head in the sand.
BUT, I do not remember a time when the administration for the office of President of the United States has brought so many law suits against some many states. The intent of crippling the states and their lawful citizens is overwhelmingly apparent.
I would sue the Federal government, but for two things... personal destruction and a court finding that I have “no standing”.
What would happen if all 50, not 57, states decided to secede and form a more perfect union without D.C.?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.