Posted on 07/30/2011 12:46:38 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Lawrence O'Donnell: "They truly did not know what the words debt ceiling meant. Look, let's admit it. It's true of most of the media, most everybody because these things were never covered before. And so they didn't know what it was. Now they were going to have to learn what it was, and they certainly weren't going to take their lesson from Washington about what the debt ceiling is. They were going to take their lessons from Sarah Palin about what it is....
(VIDEO AT LINK)
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Tea Party People = American tax payers who work in the private sector
There is nothing to kick down the road anymore.
There is nothing to kick down the road anymore.
I understand the debt ceiling perfectly. It is kind of like the dosage of heroin that an addict needs to get a fix. They insist that amount will get them by, but tomorrow the number will be bigger.
There is no educating the liberal sheeple, zombies, whose only vocabluary is, “yes, Master.” Even the talking heads on TV seem to be infected with it, and why they think the debt ceiling means nothing at all.
O’Donnell fits the description of somebody who is so “smart” that he’s stupid.
Progressivism is nothing more than Government Default and Economic Collapse.
We are all about to see it unfold and its ALL on him and the so-called intellectual genius Progressive who put us no his path.
Maybe not but I'll tell you we are gonna kick the Kenyan to the political curb come 2012.
I didn't know, so I went on the internets and Wikipedia told me that
Note how he proceeds: he does not discuss a debt crisis he frames the issue as a debt ceiling crisis. He cites a history of countless extensions of the debt ceiling and notes that that was done on a bipartisan basis. The obvious deduction? We to should solve this debt ceiling crisis as we always have with a reasonable bipartisan extension of the debt ceiling and go about the business in the sunshine of harmonious bipartisan governance.
The unspoken assumption here is that there is nothing worth fighting over. The quarrel is simply over an artificial debt limit which can be neutralized as a threat to our harmony if only the Tea Party would become reasonable.
So long as Democrats succeed in framing the issue thus, they have a chance of winning this debate. The great middle of America is at best superficially informed over the debt ceiling issue and will react to sound bites and bumper stickers. So long as the mushy middle of America feels intruded upon by an unruly, ideologically driven mob of tea baggers who are interrupting American Idol with this artificial controversy, the Democrats win the debate. That is why you did not hear and will never hear the likes of Larry O'Donnell using the word "downgrade" because he does not want the electorate to know that the debate is not over the debt ceiling but the debt.
To believe that the impending insolvency of America can be cured by legislating a way a debt ceiling is akin to expecting your doctor to cure your tumor by photoshopping an x-ray.
It is not the tea party who have precipitated this debate but the looming insolvency of the American government. It is not the Republican Party that is raising this issue but Moody's and Standard & Poor's who are simply reporting the reality of that insolvency. The Republicans, stiffened by the tea party, are the white knights coming to the rescue.
The job of conservatives to frame this debate in terms of debt, not debt ceiling.
the left can’t’ even honestly argue what the right stand for
The more these libtard progressive idiots frak with the Tea Party, the more fired up and galvanized the Tea Party becomes. These idiots better look out in 2012. Bet. =.=
hobbits, hostage takers and terrorists
How can anyone expect the opponents of the Tea Party to take the Tea Party seriously when they display such childless, mindless aptitudes.
The problem with that argument is that the last time we significantly raised the debt ceiling in 2006, the crash of 2008/2009 followed. How do we know that the crash was not caused by the debt ceiling raise ? And if we raise it again the economy could suffer another significant crash 1 to 2 years later.
Go to the bank and try to raise your debt ceiling.
When you get your phone bill - raise your debt ceiling.
When you get your electric bill - raise your debt ceiling.
When you get your insurance bill - raise your debt ceiling.
When you get your tax bill - raise your debt ceiling.
When you get your rent bill - raise your debt ceiling.
When you get your cable TV bill - raise your debt ceiling.
See how that all works.
O’Donnell attended Saint Sebastian’s School. As such, I’m sure he was taught something about calumny.
~~~~~~~~~~
from The Catholic Encyclopedia:
“Objectively, a calumny is a mortal sin when it is calculated to do serious harm to the person so traduced.”
He’s a nut. Even on MSNBC he’s on the fringe.
February 2010 - $14.294 trillion
December 2009 - $12.394 trillion
February 2009 - $12.104 trillion
October 2008 - $11.315 trillion
July 2008 - $10.615 trillion
September 2007 - $9.815 trillion
March 2006 - $8.965 trillion
So we raised the debt ceiling by about 10 % in 2006 and 10 % again in 2007. Then in 2008 the economy crashed. Clearly raising the debt ceiling by 10 % a year preceded an economic crash.
The New York Times wro0te that TPers are better educated than non TPers.
"Tea Party supporters are wealthier and more well-educated than the general public, and are no more or less afraid of falling into a lower socioeconomic class, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.