Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pyro7480

A bunch of us here on FR who completed the “survey” have been saying since it was sent out that it was clearly intended to reach a particular result. The only place to say anything negative about the effect of repeal was in a “what else did you want to say?” space at the end. The result was a foregone conclusion.

Sickening.

Colonel, USAFR


6 posted on 07/22/2011 12:10:29 PM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jagusafr
Col., I agree that this is indeed sickening.

Frankly, since people have been charged for lying to Congress in the past, this should certainly be further investigated with such a possibility in mind.

William Flax

9 posted on 07/22/2011 12:19:13 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: jagusafr

could the remarks not be used against the respondent in fitness reports down the line?


10 posted on 07/22/2011 12:29:32 PM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson