Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shhrubbery!

Oh, sorry. When you said “you” lost, I thought you meant the people who were sueing that Council, not the Council itself. What was the Council’s reaction when the law was overturned?

And what was going on that they didn’t want the public to know?


20 posted on 07/22/2011 11:30:29 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: worst-case scenario
Ha, well the Council tried its best to ignore the court's decision.

Their "reaction" was to say nothing. The only statement that was made in public was read by the town attorney. However, if citizens in the audience weren't paying close attention, they would have snoozed right through the statement, buried as it was within the context of other town business, and without reference to any controversy.

The offending ordinance itself did not have to do with keeping information from the public. What it did was limit the free speech rights of town employees.

21 posted on 07/23/2011 6:06:45 AM PDT by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson