Mort man
You are wrong. Perhaps custody is primarily to the wife....guess why....she has been the primary care giver while husband has been the primary income earner. Do the husbands want to stay home with the children and make do with what the market is willing to pay the wife? Usually not. And usually, the husbands wouldn’t even know where to start, plus Trixie LaRue isn’t interested in caring for the children, she is interested in a meal ticket. So, the wives are usually stepping up to the plate to finish caring for the children and the husbands are off with Trixie, who, being an adulteress wouldn’t be a good influence on the children anyway.
Time and again one can witness that there is a presumption that custody belongs to the wife.
It's similar to the presumption you make that the man is entirely at fault in the dissolution of the marriage.
It's a pity you cannot seem to present a coherent argument based on anything but the worst-case scenario that supports your position. Hard situations make for bad laws. Apparently, you support bad laws, provided they benefit your side of the argument.
If you are interested in debating this rationally, let me know. I will not bother to respond to any further emotionally-laden arguments you present. You apparently don't need facts - your feelings are enough.
The dear ex was supposed to pay half of Medical and College expenses, didn't happen and $350,000 later , my daughter hates my ex and I am free of alimony because she is a poor Lier and can't read a contract, in Mass.