Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Nothing the Government subidizes decreases in cost as far as I’ve seen.


3 posted on 07/20/2011 5:14:58 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Better to keep your enemy in your sights than in your camp expecting him to guard your back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Maelstorm
TAX TENURE.

Read "Faculty Lounges"--this Barone does not put enough on the shoulders of the Parasites Hunting Dinner who rip us off, work 11-2 on Tues, Wed, Thurs, let grad students to all the teaching.

After seeing a few kids through college, college professors are starting to look a lot like ambulance-chasing lawyers.

20 posted on 07/20/2011 6:03:41 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Maelstorm

The difference is that a college education produces extremely little in terms of tangible goods. When you subsidize a house, at the end you get a house. When you subsidize an oil well, at the end you get oil (hopefully). But when you subsidize a college education, all you are getting, at best, is a better mind. But there is no tangible asset acquired and, therefore, nothing of real value acquired. You *could* use that mind to get a better job or invent a better technology, etc. but there’s no guarantee of that. Some of the sharpest minds in technology today never completed college before they started making their millions.


36 posted on 07/20/2011 8:27:24 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson