Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Range Resources fires back in N. Texas water dispute {Nat Gas in Water}
Fuel Fix ^ | July 19, 2011 | Tom Fowler

Posted on 07/20/2011 3:02:51 PM PDT by thackney

Ft. Worth-based Range Resources’ ugly legal battle with some North Texas landowners and the EPA over alleged groundwater contamination has taken a new turn, with the firm filing a counter-claim against the landowners.

In 2010, Steven and Shyla Lipsky of rural Parker County complained to the Texas Railroad Commission — the agency that oversees drilling in Texas — about natural gas in their water well. The couple believed it was caused by drilling at two nearby Range gas wells.

The Lipsky’s hired a Flower Mound-based firm, Wolf Eagle Environmental, to do water and air testing. Alisa Rich, the owner, encouraged the couple to contact the Environmental Protection Agency, which filed a Dec. 7 emergency order against Range saying gas wells “caused or contributed” to the methane contamination of two water wells in the area, including the Lipsky well.

Range said the gas in the couple’s water well didn’t come from their drilling, and the Texas Railroad Commission sided with Range. However, the EPA filed a lawsuit against the company in January. At the end of June a judge ruled against Range’s motion to throw the case out and put the case on hold while an appeals court considers Range’s effort to block the EPA’s emergency order from back in December.

Also in June the Lipsky’s filed suit against Range directly, seeking $6.5 million for actual damages and mental anguish.

Late last week Range fired back, making a counterclaim in state district court in Parker County (see it below), seeking $3 million in damages from the Lipskys and saying they conspired with Rich to create misleading test results.

Range includes in its filing sections of a deposition taken of Mr. Lipsky where he acknowledges there was gas in the drinking water in years before the drilling occured, and claims a video of Mr. Lipsky lighting water from a hose was misleading because the hose was “… not a hose for water at all, but is used solely for the purpose of venting gas.”

In the filing, Range says it has suffered “significant harm to its well-deserved reputation as a high-quality driller and operator.”

Range claims Rich “serves as a hired gun for plaintiffs’ lawyers who attack the oil and gas industry.”

The Ft. Worth Star-Telegram, which wrote about Rich’s role in a number of high-profile N. Texas drilling disputes, said Rich did not respond to e-mail and voice-mail messages about the suit last week.

The Lipsky’s attorney, Allen Stewart, told the paper that Range’s allegations are “patently false and desperately sad.”

“I look forward to asking a jury to hold Range accountable for harming the Lipskys and then fabricating the far-fetched fairy tale found in their counterclaims,” Stewart told the Star-Telegram. “This just shows that when [there] are billions of dollars under the ground, companies like Range will say and do anything to get their hands on it and never admit that they can and sometimes do hurt others in the process.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: catfight; collective; corporatesocialism; energy; forthemany; naturalgas
a deposition taken of Mr. Lipsky where he acknowledges there was gas in the drinking water in years before the drilling occured...

lighting water from a hose was misleading because the hose was “… not a hose for water at all, but is used solely for the purpose of venting gas

1 posted on 07/20/2011 3:02:55 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney
Just like the burning water in Gasland isn't from an area where drilling is going on.

The fracking opponents are so dishonest it's frightening at times.

2 posted on 07/20/2011 3:09:12 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Sounds like the Lipsky’s may have been caught. I wonder if they’ve got $3 million, if they do they may not have it for long. :)


3 posted on 07/20/2011 3:11:51 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Alisa Rich’s General Liability and Errors and Omissions Insurance Carriers might. That is, if she even has coverage.


4 posted on 07/20/2011 3:26:33 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

In texas, since the GWB administration, there has been LOSER pays rules in legal action; so if Range took this to a state court they have a pretty good idea they will not lose.


5 posted on 07/20/2011 4:12:06 PM PDT by q_an_a (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
Thanks, it's a shame all our courts don't have the same loser pays rules, it'd sure cut down on frivolous lawsuits.
6 posted on 07/20/2011 4:22:36 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
so if Range took this to a state court they have a pretty good idea they will not lose.

That is why Range waited several months to make sure they have an ironclad case.

7 posted on 07/20/2011 4:47:45 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Natural gas is often found in well water. It is normal, it has no taste so what is the problem? Wells with lots of natural gas often have vents to bleed it off. One homeowner capped his well, and now gets gas for home use, and water from the same well.


8 posted on 07/20/2011 6:43:24 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
"In texas, since the GWB administration, there has been LOSER pays rules in legal action; so if Range took this to a state court they have a pretty good idea they will not lose."

Alternative B: the Lipsky's are stupid.

Alternative B is equally likely, I think, especially since even they admit there was gas in their water before the fracking began.

In fact, that's pretty common in this area, having natural gas in your water well, especially when you're drilling 800 - 1000 feet to hit water, as I did.

9 posted on 07/20/2011 9:08:06 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson