Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I bought my TV from a CA retailer, and I don’t live in CA. If he had been required to collect tax from me at that moment I would not have bought it.

Shortsighted law.


3 posted on 07/09/2011 6:43:36 AM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: I still care
Your scenario is not what the internet tax law is all about. I sell to businesses and if the goods are sent out of state, there is no sales tax. The taxes they want collected are those that are purchased by someone in California, but shipped in from out of state, or bought from companies that are actually located within California, as our intrepid legislature is saying that Amazon is by having local affiliates. However, the law is still government shooting itself in the foot.

Sales tax is not even the driving factor in the success of internet stores over “brick and mortar.” If prices were the same, ordering off the internet would not be as attractive, since you have to add in shipping to the cost in most cases. The real advantage is the internet retailer not having to pay the same costs as the guy with a "real" store. Distribution costs are less when the inventory is centralized. Rent, electricity, etc. cost much less per item and there's lower cost of labor and regulation out of state. Add in volume discounts that huge buyers like Amazon have over smaller stores and the bottom line is that a $40 item purchased down the street may only cost $25 or so online. The tax versus shipping costs are a wash, but you still save $15 bucks either way.

11 posted on 07/09/2011 8:59:25 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson