Well the Duke stripper said she was gang raped - but her blood and their semen was nowhere to be found.
The Hotel maid is slutty and stupid - but there was her blood and his semen on the sheets and the floor.
In the Duke case they said nothing sexual took place - other than the dancing she was hired to do.
In this case he was having lunch with his daughter - then they found out about the DNA - and then it was consensual.
This woman is simply too stupid and too shady for this to have been a set up. She got into the DA’s office and admitted to perjuring herself in her asylum application, about a claim of gang-rape, about her income to get subsidized housing, about her children in order to avoid taxes, etc, etc.
In other words, she sat down and admitted she had no compunction about lying in official proceedings and on official documents in order to get asylum, housing, avoid taxes, and any number of other things.
They say that rape defense has two strategies...
1) It wasn't me / nothing happened
2) it was consensual
DSK tried #1 - then reverted back to #2 when they found out about the DNA.
The lacrosse players at Duke went with #1 - and all evidence supported that - thus their exoneration.
True, On all points!!!!!
You said it better than I did.
One difference is that Strauss-Khan’s DNA was found on the maid. In Duke case, the DNA on the stripper was from NONE of the Duke players, one of whom was not even there, IIRC. The source of the DNA was not made public.