Posted on 07/01/2011 11:18:16 PM PDT by Cincinna
PARISThe release of Dominique Strauss-Kahn on Friday from house arrest in New York represented a startling turnaround, sharpening the focus of political debate here on a central and potent issue: with the weakening of sexual assault charges against him, will he be able to resume a potentially stellar career that could lead to the presidency of his country?
The question divided opinion as much among Mr. Strauss-Kahns own Socialist Party followers as those on the right. Moments after his release, the party spokesman, Benoît Hamon, told reporters that the courts decision had come as an intense relief. Beyond that, the calculation likely to absorb party strategists revolved around the degree to which Mr. Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the International Monetary Fund, had been damaged by weeks of disclosures and accusations that, even days ago, seemed to have drawn an abrupt and indelible line across his ambitions and his career.
Before Mr. Strauss-Kahns release from house arrest, two well-placed law enforcement officials in New York said that the case against him was on the verge of collapse because of major questions about the credibility of his accuser, a hotel housekeeper who said he had sexually assaulted her in a suite at the Sofitel hotel in Manhattan in mid-May.
The surprising shift in his favor both fascinated and divided France on Friday, spurring calls from his supporters for his rehabilitation. France needs his competence, his talents and his international standing, said the former culture minister Jack Lang, a Socialist and close ally. Earlier, other Socialists expressed doubts.
Lets all stay calm, Gérard Le Gall, a Socialist and public opinion expert, said hours before a court in Manhattan changed the terms of Mr. Strauss-Kahns bail, freeing him on his own recognizance.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Oh, sure. Famous name, indeed, even if he inherited it. But he has simply been mentioned in the articles. Not the kind of headline grabbing stuff that you sometimes see, with the primary focus is on the prosecutor and his latest showboating.
As the DA, Cyrus the Great has been in charge of the case. See this morning WSJ.
At a trial the credibility of witnesses is critical. It won’t make sense for the prosecutors to take this to trial, even if a rape did occur, if this woman’s word cannot be taken as truthful.
Apparently what she did out of order was to call her incarcerated boyfriend, all of whose phone calls are recorded, and ask him how to take advantage of her situation, whatever the situation was. I’ve just read about that for the first time today so don’t have details, but that was not a brilliant move on her part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.