Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MissesBush
I don't like hypotheticals normally, but if Romney is the Republican nominee, I will be as active as possible to work against both candidates.

This perception promoted by both Parties that a Third Party candidate cannot win is false. If given the choice of two Liberals and one Conservative, especially in the economic times we're in, I'm choosing the Conservative. Unlike Democrats, I will remain true to my beliefs versus remaining true to a political party.

Remember your history. In 1860, a Third Party candidate became a President. The President was Lincoln and the Third Party was the Republican Party.

One scenario which seems possible given the dynamics is no one candidate would gain the required 270 Electoral votes. That being the case, the election would be turned over to a Republican controlled House.

44 posted on 07/01/2011 9:09:16 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Rational Thought

That’s not really true. The Whigs had been long since expired when Lincoln was elected.


55 posted on 07/01/2011 9:48:41 AM PDT by MissesBush (Obama logic re: Weiner. Twitter your junk = I would resign. Destroy a nation = I deserve re-election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson