Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PetroniusMaximus

I think the design has some interesting differences. The most obvious difference is the tail. Instead of the V of the Global Hawk, they have a single vertical and very long horizontal stabilizers. They also have the little winglets.

A couple other differences is the size of the intake for the engine and the size of the front section. Both appear smaller than the Global Hawk.

I’m not an engineer but... the tail section means increased drag & weight. The V stabilizer of the Global Hawk requires more sophisticated flight control software. so their software isn’t as sophisticated. Smaller engines, less capable flight software, less range, less performance, lower capacity to carry equipment or weapons.

I’d assume the Chinese variant has lower significantly performance than the Global Hawk.


9 posted on 06/30/2011 11:19:53 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

100% correct.


10 posted on 06/30/2011 11:56:11 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver
I’d assume the Chinese variant has lower significantly performance than the Global Hawk.

That doesn't necessarily matter. If their version is much cheaper, then they can potentially loft many more of them on a given budget.

13 posted on 07/27/2011 7:06:02 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (When you've only heard lies your entire life, the truth sounds insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson