Skip to comments.
Anchorage Daily News: Poll shows Alaskans would vote for Obama over Palin
Anchorage Daily News ^
| 06/28/2011
| Sean Cockerham
Posted on 06/28/2011 6:06:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-158 next last
To: Recovering_Democrat
Were doomed
Hey, that's my line. This is definitely icing on the cake.
81
posted on
06/28/2011 7:34:17 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Interstate <> Intrastate)
To: SeekAndFind
So I geuss the hopey changey thing is working for Alaska, eh?
To: org.whodat
No - it’s shows this poll is bogus. Gee, how easily you are taken in.
To: presently no screen name
Do you know or did you check to find out if this poll was done by registered or likely voters?Likely voters, but no other internals except to say they called a "random list."
84
posted on
06/28/2011 7:37:16 PM PDT
by
Jess79
To: SeekAndFind
I am not buying it. I’ll bet they over sampled Rats in order to get that result.
85
posted on
06/28/2011 7:37:49 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
To: SeekAndFind
murkowski picked up the dim votes as they knew the dim could not win... so liberal dims and rinoid republican machine hacks that were aligned with the 40 year old murkowski political cabal... that so hated miller because Palin put him on top of murkowski the incumbent... next lawsuits were filed by murkowski and a recount ensued and more hanging chad lawsuits took place and she squeaked by on a bogus recount and corrupt vote counting.
LLS
86
posted on
06/28/2011 7:38:14 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
To: org.whodat
Possible, but 4.4% margin of error= crap poll.
87
posted on
06/28/2011 7:39:11 PM PDT
by
prof.h.mandingo
(Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
To: redhead
Murkowski conceded, remember? Then, all of a sudden, she was back in the race.In the primary she conceded, not in the general election. The general election returns were pretty clear from the outset that Murkowski had defeated Miller and that dopey McAdams stooge.
We won some nice victories this past November, but we did nominate a few duds and Miller turned out to be one of them.
To: jennychase
Hays also had McCain 46.6, Obama 43.9 11/2/08. Actual results, 11/3/08: McCain 59.4, Obama 37.9
How's that for deception from Hays and their anti conservative, anti Palin agenda.
To: Pilated
No doubt at all... the info is on the web.
LLS
90
posted on
06/28/2011 7:40:27 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
To: jennychase
Yup. that’s what happens when you only poll your buddies...you get the results you want.
To: LibLieSlayer
Exactly and then the liberal judge got involved.
To: GR_Jr.
All the MSM hatred is going to blow up in their faces if she runs. I ask all the people that say,”I hate that bitch” or “She’s stupid” what she’s said that was stupid or they didn’t agree with. They have no answer and become quiet. I tell them that they should actually listen to her before making an opinion.
This, IMHO, will be a determining factor. If she becomes the Republican front-runner there is no way the MSM can keep the American people from hearing her message. Even most liberals are disenchanted with their messiah and are looking for a way out. God be with her(and us) and let her voice be heard.
To: org.whodat
When you are a conservative, your popularity in the face of constant bad press, only exists when you can fight back, such as during holding an office that is in the public eye, or especially when you are campaigning and get to counter bad media with your own ads.
That is the old story for conservatives, hated in between elections, and then breaking all expectations on election days.
94
posted on
06/28/2011 7:47:15 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(America has close to India population of 1950s, India has 1,200,000,000 people now. Quality of Life?)
To: Longbow1969
See post #86: “murkowski picked up the dim votes as they knew the dim could not win... so liberal dims and rinoid republican machine hacks that were aligned with the 40 year old murkowski political cabal... that so hated miller because Palin put him on top of murkowski the incumbent... next lawsuits were filed by murkowski and a recount ensued and more hanging chad lawsuits took place and she squeaked by on a bogus recount and corrupt vote counting.
LLS.”
95
posted on
06/28/2011 7:47:37 PM PDT
by
redhead
(Don't bother to impeach the miserable SOB, ARREST him!)
To: Venturer
The only way Sarah Palin could lose Alaska is if there was a 3rd party. As I was saying, this is just more of the MSM/Rep establishment trying to manufacture opinion.
Romney is not leading in Iowa, his own internal polls tell him Iowa is a lost cause. Bachmann`s numbers are also inflated... MSM/Rep establishment is pushing Bachmann
96
posted on
06/28/2011 7:47:37 PM PDT
by
Friendofgeorge
(SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST)
To: presently no screen name
It is the marxist way... and do you know what the difference between a marxist... a dim and the republican party elite like the murkowski clan... absolutely nothing.
LLS
97
posted on
06/28/2011 7:48:16 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
("GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH"! I choose LIBERTY and PALIN!)
To: Jess79
Right and thanks Likely voters, but no other internals except to say they called a "random list."
Random list up to their discretion from this KNOWN anti conservative anti Palin pollster. And idiots here are agreeing with it! LOL!
To: ansel12
Bet you were screaming at your radio today when rushes replacement said she could not win. And all those polls you mention had the same 25 + % of no support.
To: Longbow1969
We won some nice victories this past November, but we did nominate a few duds and Miller turned out to be one of them. What killed Miller in that close race, was the Senate Republicans endorsing the incumbent Republican Senator Murkowski, that wiped out Miller's position as the Primary winner and almost made him seem the non-republican.
100
posted on
06/28/2011 7:53:00 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(America has close to India population of 1950s, India has 1,200,000,000 people now. Quality of Life?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-158 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson