Thanks for the prediction.
You seem to be unaware just how unique this particular claim is. It is no run-of-the-mill scam, he’s got several scientists saying it’s real.
This is the normal pattern for this kind of scam. Find a few people willing to say it’s possible, then put spin on that to make it seem like they have blessed it. No scientist would ever say anything is “real” unless it was independently reproduced by multiple labs, apparently not the case here. That should be your first clue.
Three months will come and go, and nothing will be apparent other than pleas for “just a little” more funding. This is how they get investors to throw good money after bad and keep the scam going. Seen it over and over again, it is a standard playbook.
In the end, to avoid prosecution, they will claim the big energy companies conspired to destroy them. Again, standard playbook. The truth is: the big companies would be the first to license this if it were real. They would be falling over themselves to bid for it.