[seenenuf]

It's a large mistake to think that ‘women’ and the ACLU
righteously attacked WM. It was a big labor move, as
all previous attempts to get the work force at WM to
unionize. It's Big Labor that hates WM, using
women employees - (who probably were paid potted plants)to
bring grief and financial ruin to WM. They will try again.
Past action against the fact that some WM’s sold guns and ammo were beat back. Maybe it will be Big Gov that will
attack the pharmacy at my WM... who knows, but WM has too many employees, with possible union dues, to be ignored by Big Labor. No wonder “card check” is #1 issue with
Big Labor.

[dools0007world]

I find it ironic that Big Labor, and its Marxist puppeteers, are trying to kill Wal Mart simply because it’s big and nonunion.

These ideological whackos refuse to acknowledge the fact that Wal Mart hires many folks from poor areas and sells poor people nice quality stuff they can afford.

It’s good the SC knocked the class action down. Let these allegedly wronged women sue individually and see what happens. I wonder if ACLU will stick by them if they do.

[REPANDPROUDOFIT]

I'm a little confused by your reply. Is Big Labor paying the legal bills for the women employees (or potted plants, good one)?

I know when blacks file a race discrimination suit, many of them can retain lawyers from the ACLU for "free", meaning you and I are required to finance such cases with our taxpayer money. Because the plaintiff has nothing invested in the cost of the trial, there is no reason to care how long it goes on or how expensive it gets. I posted because I wondered if the ACLU might be representing these women. In other words, are you and I are paying to attack WM!?

I don't understand your statement about the pharmacy and Big Gov.