Replies

I need more information in order to decide who is the lying piece of filth.
1. Why is a SWAT team being used, even if it was for financial aid fraud as they so stated?
2. Why did SWAT go into a nonviolent, non-hostage situation with guns drawn while there were children in the home?
3. If their intel was so rock-solid, why after 6 hours in a police car with his children, did they release the man without arrest?

See, I really don’t care what kind of “fraud” was perpetrated: not paying student loans, lying on your application, etc. The use of SWAT here (as well as with the murdered Marine in AZ) is psychological warfare against the people of this country by its government. This was a non-violent crime and should have been responded to in a non-violent manner.

They are conditioning us to accept the use of SWAT/violent forced entry as routine and expected.

Re: My previous post:
OK, scratch SWAT and put in heavily armed department of education officers behaving in SWAT-like manner.

Makes no difference. Wrong is wrong. Whether or not it was a quote-unquote “SWAT” team or not is a distraction. Our government is using armed goon squads to terrorize its citizens for non-violent monetary crimes.

1. Why is a SWAT team being used, even if it was for financial aid fraud as they so stated?

There was no SWAT team.

2. Why did SWAT go into a nonviolent, non-hostage situation with guns drawn while there were children in the home?

There was no SWAT Team.

3. If their intel was so rock-solid, why after 6 hours in a police car with his children, did they release the man without arrest?

Because in many cases, an arrest after a search warrant is made later. Either because the criminal at the time agrees to cooperate or if the offense is non-violent, the officers agree that rather than letting the person sit in jail and having to make bond, they will wait and indict the person.

See, I really don’t care what kind of “fraud” was perpetrated: not paying student loans, lying on your application, etc. The use of SWAT here (as well as with the murdered Marine in AZ) is psychological warfare against the people of this country by its government. This was a non-violent crime and should have been responded to in a non-violent manner.

1. There was no SWAT Team. 2. The 'murdered' 'Marine' case in Arizona has also been shown to be an ignorant fraud, as the warrant was released showing rock solid PC of extensive criminal activity. I guess you hadn't got that memo yet. There was no SWAT team.

Here's my county's SWAT team tasks. Kinda makes one wonder about the exact definition of "hazardous". Perhaps showing up in the early morning hours with a cast of thousands of armed individuals creates its own hazardous situation?

A self fulfilling prophesy.

The STRU (Special Threats Response) is made up of deputies who have been specially trained in the use of special weapons and tactics (SWAT) and deputies and mental health specialists specially trained to negotiate during crisis situations (Crisis Negotiation Team - CNT). Utilization of STRU may include anti-sniper tactics, anti-terrorist tactics, barricaded subjects, apprehension of armed and/or dangerous persons, execution of search warrants in hazardous situation, crisis situations and hostage rescue operations, dignitary protection, and any other situation which would require the expertise of a well-trained team. K-9 Team"