Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Ummmmm.......he in essence embezzled a million dollars from campaign funds and funneled it to his mistress. Vague law? I think embezzlement is more than a “vague” law

It is the PROSECUTION not persecution of the Breck Girl.

2 posted on 06/09/2011 6:49:28 AM PDT by NWFLConservative (Game On!.................Saracuda 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NWFLConservative

98% of the politicians in this country should be in prison together, IMO.


4 posted on 06/09/2011 6:52:35 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NWFLConservative

This guy deserves a long stretch in the cross bar hotel, not for cheating on his dem loving wife but for what he did which was diverting money to pay off a paramour to maintain his credibility of being a family man....just not which family I guess.


5 posted on 06/09/2011 6:52:48 AM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NWFLConservative
It is the PROSECUTION not persecution of the Breck Girl.

He's going to be very popular....in prison


10 posted on 06/09/2011 6:57:03 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NWFLConservative; Kaslin
I think Chapman is right. According to reputable experts concerning the law in question, 90% of them wouldn't have thought the donations were at that point restricted to be campaign contributions. In other words, there's a real ambiguity as to whether these were "for whatever you need, John" gifts.

If there's ambiguity and even the campaign-law experts can't agree, there's no certainty "beyond reasonable doubt" that he was guilty of a crime.

We, too --- every single one of us --- need to protected from prosecution on laws which were too vague for a reasonable person to know what was allowed and what was prohibited. And aggressive, selective prosecution exploiting equivocal legal bafflegab is unjust, even if it's an injustice against a cold-hearted lying adulterer-pustule like Edwards.

As Chapman stated in the final words of the article, "He may deserve to rot in hell. Just not in jail."

12 posted on 06/09/2011 7:03:27 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (My two cents' worth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NWFLConservative

Not even close.
The money never went into a campaign fund, but the government says that it SHOULD have gone into the campaign fund because it was an “in kind” contribution, in that attempts to keep his affair and bastard child a secret were more about the campaign than about his personal life.

Edwards got “friends” to pony up cash for his girlfriend, but none of it was campaign money and no amount of leglalese is gonna help the government prove it as such.

The government has a WEAK case and Edwards is gonna WALK.


22 posted on 06/09/2011 7:32:01 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NWFLConservative

“he in essence embezzled a million dollars from campaign funds and funneled it to his mistress.”

The money she got wasn’t from campaign donations, it was sent directly to her.

If there is any crime it is that she didn’t pay income taxes on it.


35 posted on 06/09/2011 10:19:46 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson