Second to last line of the post:
"I’m going to close with this: Andrew Breitbart has been on the radio today saying that he has new information that is going to change the dynamics of this story.
1 posted on
06/05/2011 6:12:26 PM PDT by
astuddis
To: astuddis
2 posted on
06/05/2011 6:15:33 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
("...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,..")
To: astuddis
Brietbart is always good for some fun.
3 posted on
06/05/2011 6:16:03 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: astuddis
Evidence the Media Was Duped into Dropping the Investigation No one was duped. The media's complicity in protecting liberals is, as always, quite deliberage.
4 posted on
06/05/2011 6:17:01 PM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("It's hard to take the president seriously." - Jim DeMint)
To: astuddis
To: astuddis
There was a Facebook page named “Anthony Weiner’s P*nis” but Facebook deleted it.
It was popular while it lasted.
It featured photos of his “p*nis” (actually a hot dog) around town, trying to avoid the paparazzi.
6 posted on
06/05/2011 6:18:41 PM PDT by
LyinLibs
(All moslems are somewhere on the killing-you spectrum)
To: astuddis
I wonder what Mrs. Weiner has to say about that?
To: astuddis
“Duped” my asz.
Choice emphasis and selective filtration to cover for their Commie allies is more accurate
Anthony Cocktail Weenie is not Richard Nixon, even though his crimes are MUCH greater.
8 posted on
06/05/2011 6:20:43 PM PDT by
EyeGuy
(2012: When the Levee Breaks)
To: astuddis
who hacked weiner’s weiner?
10 posted on
06/05/2011 6:24:22 PM PDT by
ken21
(liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
To: astuddis
My husband and I heard an interview with Breitbart earlier this week and I told my husband I had a feeling her had more on this.
Breitbart is the master of rope a dope.
12 posted on
06/05/2011 6:28:10 PM PDT by
kalee
(The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
To: astuddis
Betty and Veronica?
I guess Obama would be Jughead, and Soros would be Richie Rich, or should that be Trump?
20 posted on
06/05/2011 7:02:44 PM PDT by
GnuHere
To: astuddis; FlingWingFlyer
22 posted on
06/05/2011 7:16:31 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(How do you starve an Obama supporter? Hide his food stamps under his work boots.)
To: astuddis
27 posted on
06/05/2011 7:35:40 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: astuddis
Here’s a thought......both Twitter and Yfrog do not appreciate the suggestion their software is open to hackers>that is bad for business. I bet Yfrog and Twitter clear their good names with help from the blogsphere....
To: astuddis
It just gets worser and worser.
31 posted on
06/05/2011 8:06:27 PM PDT by
YHAOS
(you betcha!)
To: astuddis
Well I read the entire article, and while it contained a lot of detail, there was no additional smoking gun. There could be, but so far, I believe Weiner’s “investigators” are doing a good job of cleaning things up. Paying the right people...deleting the damaging files and writing the narrative to fit the remaining facts.
To: astuddis
When it’s the first time you do something “illicit” you are nervous and very careful. You make sure everything is just perfect before hitting send.
Obviously the little Pri#$ was over confident from having posted his puny pecker many times before.
37 posted on
06/05/2011 10:19:48 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
To: astuddis
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
