Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn

I’ve thought for some time that Palin, if she wants to run or even once again be part of the ticket, should forego appearances in these venues: not so much for ‘what it means’, but for what the MSM (CNN among them) will say it means about her. She’s playing , and has ALWAYS played, directly to the Tea Party constituency, but IMHO she would be better served (if those are her ambitions) to start ALSO
putting forth a more ‘serious’ image.I have no idea at this point if she sees herself as being an essential ingredient in “kingmaking” or whether she wants to be the King herself.
Still, this kind of thing probably cannot go on into 2012, and win her, or her feasibility, wider and wider support.
Of course, ‘that’s just my opinion, I could be wrong”.


16 posted on 06/04/2011 7:57:05 AM PDT by supremedoctrine (BURMA SHAVE! (sorry you missed the previous four taglines))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: supremedoctrine
she would be better served (if those are her ambitions) to start ALSO putting forth a more ‘serious’ image

I disagree. Pretending to be an academic bore with an oh-so-solemn approach to every issue will lose her entire constituency and gain her nothing. One can be extremely serious about right and wrong, and about policies that have been shown to work vs. those known to fail, again and again, without a serious "image."

The Democrats want us to run a bore who will play the "government must be the solution" game with their candidate.

22 posted on 06/04/2011 8:06:47 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Oh most loving Father, preserve us from faithless fears and worldly anxieties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: supremedoctrine

What do you mean as a “serious image”? Walking around in a dress going to a academic institution to make a speech? Who cares what CNN says about her, they would say it anyway no matter what she did or wherever she goes.


29 posted on 06/04/2011 8:18:13 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: supremedoctrine

She’s running, and these informal press opportunities are the only way she can talk to the press right now beyond her Fox contract. Not pre-announcing her schedule was a brilliant way of keeping the media and the unions from being able to make protesters the story.


32 posted on 06/04/2011 8:21:23 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: supremedoctrine
"Of course, ‘that’s just my opinion, I could be wrong”."

Aye, you've nailed it: you are wrong!!

Be Ever Vigilant!!

36 posted on 06/04/2011 8:25:34 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: supremedoctrine

Sarah Palin is the Tea Party. Perhaps someday you and the rest of the intellegencia will get off your high horses and understand that. By serious image you mean like obama, Reid and Pelosi who are seriously drowning us in debt?

Here is a virtual dollar so you can go buy a virtual clue.

Pray for America


39 posted on 06/04/2011 8:34:14 AM PDT by bray (Hey Country Club, hold Sarah's coat while she kicks his ____.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: supremedoctrine

You left out this part; and when the serious candidates gather for battle plans, she can fetch coffee, and maybe whip out a batch of cookies.


67 posted on 06/04/2011 11:59:05 AM PDT by itsahoot (We make jokes, they make progress. Dimmitude, get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson