To: Oldpuppymax
Someone needs to bring it up again.
2 posted on
06/03/2011 10:15:00 AM PDT by
nikos1121
To: Oldpuppymax
Yep, that ole ‘fundamentally-flawed’ document.
3 posted on
06/03/2011 10:15:45 AM PDT by
ComputerGuy
(HM2/USN M/3/3 Marines RVN 66-67)
To: Oldpuppymax
Though the Constitution does not define natural born, it is clear that the meaning had been based upon principles included in a work quite popular with many of the Founders, the 1758 Law of Nations by Frenchman Emerich de Vattel So the constitution "says so," even though it actually doesn't.
Sorry, this "natural born" charade is still just a bunch of folks grasping at straws. They're hoping to find a magic way to remove Obama that doesn't involve actual work.
4 posted on
06/03/2011 10:19:33 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: Oldpuppymax
Senate Resolution 511 which stated that his birth in the Panama Canal Zone did not violate the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution. Is that the one that little bammy put in a line about "believes themselves eligible to be President" or something along those lines?
.
8 posted on
06/03/2011 10:50:08 AM PDT by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Oldpuppymax
We live in an age where Bill Clinton can quibble about the meaning of the word “is” while giving a sworn deposition. You don’t think that Barak Obama & his voters can’t tap-dance their way out of this?
11 posted on
06/03/2011 11:25:14 AM PDT by
Tallguy
(Received a fine from the NFL for a helmet-to-helmet hit.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson