It would have been a whole lot more convenient if you had just posted a link to this book long article.
That way, others could have posted a response .. without having to scroll through the whole thing first.
That being said .. This guy is full of it!
Being former “special forces” myself and having been trained with one of the world’s finest search and destroy outfits .. There is Absolutely No scenario that I am aware of .. where a properly trained unit would have a need to unload 60+ rounds into one poor bass-turd!
The writer seems to agree with you. What am I missing?
That the SWAT team apparently did not immediately follow up their fire and completely clear the home is further, damning evidence of unbelievably poor leadership and execution. For those who have experience in such matters, the apparent behavior of the police is simply mind-boggling.
Nonsense. If he had just posted a link, he would have gotten complaints asking why he didn’t just post the whole thing. It’s gotten to be a FR thing. People complaining about the way other people post.
Above the title there’s a “Skip to Comments” link.
At FR, we post the whole thing if at all possible. Stuff has a way of disappearing on the internet.
Being former “special forces” myself and having been trained with one of the world’s finest search and destroy outfits .. There is Absolutely No scenario that I am aware of .. where a properly trained unit would have a need to unload 60+ rounds into one poor bass-turd!
Not sure why you think he's full of it; that seemed to be his conclusion as well (among a lot of others).
You should consider tag teaming with Humblebummer.
Between the two of you no one would dare post anything.
That's exactly what the author said in about five different ways so how is he full of it?