Good for you Campion.
There are a lot of self-described and self-promoting "experts on Constitutional law" on these forums.
Yet they seem to be versed only in whatever Ron Paul or Jerome Corsi's latest ramblings are.
The nbc argument is the successor to the not born in the U.S. i.e Birther argument. They failed with that one, so they think they can do another end around with the "he's not a natural born citizen" argument. That will fail too. In short, there's no possibility that Obama will be thrown out of office due to either argument, yet they persist. Now they're wreaking more havoc by attempting to disqualify future, great possible Pubbie nominees with this nbc gobbledygook. I've looked at the constitution as well, read various commentaries, and couldn't find anything that agreed with the nbcers argument.
I will freely admit to not being a lawyer or a constitutional expert. But just because of what some founding fathers may have thought, the ultimate source and authority of all our laws is the constitution. If the constitution backs their argument, they have a just argument. If not, and it appears it doesn't, they should drop the matter and get down to the business of throwing Obama out by the ballot box.